Sex differences in auditory processing vary across estrous cycle

Jennifer Krizman, Elena K. Rotondo, Trent Nicol, Nina Kraus*, Kasia Bieszczad

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

In humans, females process a sound’s harmonics more robustly than males. As estrogen regulates auditory plasticity in a sex-specific manner in seasonally breeding animals, estrogen signaling is one hypothesized mechanism for this difference in humans. To investigate whether sex differences in harmonic encoding vary similarly across the reproductive cycle of mammals, we recorded frequency-following responses (FFRs) to a complex sound in male and female rats. Female FFRs were collected during both low and high levels of circulating estrogen during the estrous cycle. Overall, female rodents had larger harmonic encoding than male rodents, and greater harmonic strength was seen during periods of greater estrogen production in the females. These results argue that hormonal differences, specifically estrogen, underlie sex differences in harmonic encoding in rodents and suggest that a similar mechanism may underlie differences seen in humans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number22898
JournalScientific reports
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021

Funding

The authors thank Hanna Caiola for assistance in collecting vaginal lavage samples and cycle phase determination and Travis White-Schwoch, Silvia Bonacina, and Rembrandt Otto-Meyer for their intellectual discussions about these data. This work was funded by National Institutes of Health grants R01-NS102500 (NK) and R01-DC018561 (KMB) as well as the Knowles Hearing Center, Northwestern University (NK). The authors declare no competing interests. Data and materials are available upon request.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sex differences in auditory processing vary across estrous cycle'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this