Sex differences in regret: All for love or some for lust?

Neal J. Roese*, Ginger L. Pennington, Jill Coleman, Maria Janicki, Norman P. Li, Douglas T. Kenrick

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Few sex differences in regret or counterfactual thinking are evident in past research. The authors discovered a sex difference in regret that is both domain-specific (i.e., unique to romantic relationships) and interpretable within a convergence of theories of evolution and regulatory focus. Three studies showed that within romantic relationships, men emphasize regrets of inaction over action (which correspond to promotion vs. prevention goals, respectively), whereas women report regrets of inaction and action with equivalent frequency. Sex differences were not evident in other interpersonal regrets (friendship, parental, sibling interactions) and were not moderated by relationship status. Although the sex difference was evident in regrets centering on both sexual and nonsexual relationship aspects, it was substantially larger for sexual regrets. These findings underscore the utility of applying an evolutionary perspective to better understand goal-regulating, cognitive processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)770-780
Number of pages11
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2006

Fingerprint

Love
Sex Characteristics
Emotions
Siblings
Research

Keywords

  • Affect
  • Counterfactual
  • Evolution
  • Goals
  • Motivation
  • Parental investment
  • Regret
  • Regulatory focus
  • Sex differences
  • Sexual strategies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Roese, Neal J. ; Pennington, Ginger L. ; Coleman, Jill ; Janicki, Maria ; Li, Norman P. ; Kenrick, Douglas T. / Sex differences in regret : All for love or some for lust?. In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2006 ; Vol. 32, No. 6. pp. 770-780.
@article{c2bb79fd96c44715b6e3247e79de8b7b,
title = "Sex differences in regret: All for love or some for lust?",
abstract = "Few sex differences in regret or counterfactual thinking are evident in past research. The authors discovered a sex difference in regret that is both domain-specific (i.e., unique to romantic relationships) and interpretable within a convergence of theories of evolution and regulatory focus. Three studies showed that within romantic relationships, men emphasize regrets of inaction over action (which correspond to promotion vs. prevention goals, respectively), whereas women report regrets of inaction and action with equivalent frequency. Sex differences were not evident in other interpersonal regrets (friendship, parental, sibling interactions) and were not moderated by relationship status. Although the sex difference was evident in regrets centering on both sexual and nonsexual relationship aspects, it was substantially larger for sexual regrets. These findings underscore the utility of applying an evolutionary perspective to better understand goal-regulating, cognitive processes.",
keywords = "Affect, Counterfactual, Evolution, Goals, Motivation, Parental investment, Regret, Regulatory focus, Sex differences, Sexual strategies",
author = "Roese, {Neal J.} and Pennington, {Ginger L.} and Jill Coleman and Maria Janicki and Li, {Norman P.} and Kenrick, {Douglas T.}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0146167206286709",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "770--780",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
issn = "0146-1672",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Sex differences in regret : All for love or some for lust? / Roese, Neal J.; Pennington, Ginger L.; Coleman, Jill; Janicki, Maria; Li, Norman P.; Kenrick, Douglas T.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 32, No. 6, 01.06.2006, p. 770-780.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex differences in regret

T2 - All for love or some for lust?

AU - Roese, Neal J.

AU - Pennington, Ginger L.

AU - Coleman, Jill

AU - Janicki, Maria

AU - Li, Norman P.

AU - Kenrick, Douglas T.

PY - 2006/6/1

Y1 - 2006/6/1

N2 - Few sex differences in regret or counterfactual thinking are evident in past research. The authors discovered a sex difference in regret that is both domain-specific (i.e., unique to romantic relationships) and interpretable within a convergence of theories of evolution and regulatory focus. Three studies showed that within romantic relationships, men emphasize regrets of inaction over action (which correspond to promotion vs. prevention goals, respectively), whereas women report regrets of inaction and action with equivalent frequency. Sex differences were not evident in other interpersonal regrets (friendship, parental, sibling interactions) and were not moderated by relationship status. Although the sex difference was evident in regrets centering on both sexual and nonsexual relationship aspects, it was substantially larger for sexual regrets. These findings underscore the utility of applying an evolutionary perspective to better understand goal-regulating, cognitive processes.

AB - Few sex differences in regret or counterfactual thinking are evident in past research. The authors discovered a sex difference in regret that is both domain-specific (i.e., unique to romantic relationships) and interpretable within a convergence of theories of evolution and regulatory focus. Three studies showed that within romantic relationships, men emphasize regrets of inaction over action (which correspond to promotion vs. prevention goals, respectively), whereas women report regrets of inaction and action with equivalent frequency. Sex differences were not evident in other interpersonal regrets (friendship, parental, sibling interactions) and were not moderated by relationship status. Although the sex difference was evident in regrets centering on both sexual and nonsexual relationship aspects, it was substantially larger for sexual regrets. These findings underscore the utility of applying an evolutionary perspective to better understand goal-regulating, cognitive processes.

KW - Affect

KW - Counterfactual

KW - Evolution

KW - Goals

KW - Motivation

KW - Parental investment

KW - Regret

KW - Regulatory focus

KW - Sex differences

KW - Sexual strategies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646400003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646400003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0146167206286709

DO - 10.1177/0146167206286709

M3 - Article

C2 - 16648202

AN - SCOPUS:33646400003

VL - 32

SP - 770

EP - 780

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

SN - 0146-1672

IS - 6

ER -