Sexual Minority Women's and Gender-Diverse Individuals' Hope and Empowerment Responses to the 2016 Presidential Election

Ellen D.B. Riggle*, Sharon S. Rostosky, Laurie Drabble, Cindy B. Veldhuis, Tonda L. Hughes

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

The 2016 presidential election and its outcome evoked strong reactions for many people in the United States. Women who identify as lesbian, bisexual, or queer, and individuals who identify as transgender or genderqueer felt at increased risk of experiencing discrimination and minority stress after the election (Veldhuis et al., 2017). Finding positive strategies for reacting to the election outcome is important for the well-being of individuals in these groups. Hope and empowerment theories provide a useful framework for understanding individuals' responses to the election. As part of a larger online survey, 387 sexual minority women and transgender individuals responded to open-ended questions concerning their reactions to the election, including “What makes you feel hopeful or empowered?” Using experiential thematic analyses (Braun & Clarke, 2006) 3 main themes emerged: individual agency, recognition of support from others, and political engagement and collective action. Multiple subthemes for each theme illustrated the range of responses consistent with hope and empowerment theories. We discuss implications for strength-based interventions to promote resilience in this population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)152-173
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of GLBT Family Studies
Volume14
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 15 2018

Keywords

  • bisexual women
  • coping
  • empowerment
  • hope
  • lesbian
  • minority stress
  • transgender

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sexual Minority Women's and Gender-Diverse Individuals' Hope and Empowerment Responses to the 2016 Presidential Election'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this