Shape is like space: Modeling shape representation as a set of qualitative spatial relations

Andrew Lovett*, Kenneth D Forbus

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Representing and comparing two-dimensional shapes is an important problem. Our hypothesis about human representations is that that people utilize two representations of shape: an abstract, qualitative representation of the spatial relations between the shape's parts, and a detailed, quantitative representation. The advantage of relational, qualitative representations is that they facilitate shape comparison: two shapes can be compared via structural alignment processes which have been used to model similarity and analogy more broadly. This comparison process plays an important role in determining when two objects share the same shape, or in identifying transformations (rotations and reflections) between two shapes. Based on our hypothesis, we have built a computational model which automatically constructs both qualitative and quantitative representations and uses them to compare two-dimensional shapes in visual scenes. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our model by summarizing a series of studies which have simulated human spatial reasoning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCognitive Shape Processing - Papers from the AAAI Spring Symposium, Technical Report
Pages21-27
Number of pages7
StatePublished - Oct 21 2010
Event2010 AAAI Spring Symposium - Stanford, CA, United States
Duration: Mar 22 2010Mar 24 2010

Publication series

NameAAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report
VolumeSS-10-02

Other

Other2010 AAAI Spring Symposium
CountryUnited States
CityStanford, CA
Period3/22/103/24/10

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Artificial Intelligence

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Shape is like space: Modeling shape representation as a set of qualitative spatial relations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this