Should we rethink the criteria for VBAC? No. VBAC poses a low and acceptable risk

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

@article{e20452b6f86d4c808549b22a5cda06a0,

title = "Should we rethink the criteria for VBAC? No. VBAC poses a low and acceptable risk",

author = "Socol, {Michael L.}",

year = "1999",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "44",

journal = "Emergency Medicine",

issn = "0013-6654",

publisher = "Quadrant Healthcom Inc.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should we rethink the criteria for VBAC? No. VBAC poses a low and acceptable risk

AU - Socol, Michael L.

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0347140632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0347140632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0347140632

SN - 0013-6654

VL - 44

JO - Emergency Medicine

JF - Emergency Medicine

IS - 1

ER -