TY - JOUR
T1 - Sickle cell disease patients' perceptions of emergency department pain management
AU - Porter, Jerlym
AU - Feinglass, Joe
AU - Artz, Nicole
AU - Hafner, John
AU - Tanabe, Paula
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding/Support: This research was supported by a grant from the Mayday Fund (awarded to Dr Tanabe). Dr Porter was supported by a grant from the Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research (T32 HS00078).
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) experience painful crises that often require admission to the emergency department (ED) for pain management. Factors such as ED overcrowding and negative perception and stigmatization of SCD may impact patients' perceptions of the quality of pain management in the ED. Data from a multisite prospective cohort study was assessed to determine whether demographic (age and sex), clinical (time to administration of initial analgesia, number of analgesic doses, discharge disposition, and clinical site), or interpersonal factors (separately measured perceptions of being treated with trust and respect by ED triage nurses, nurses, and physicians) were associated with patient ratings of their pain management in the ED. Patients were adults with SCD seen at 3 EDs (2 urban and 1 rural). Demographic and clinical information was derived from medical record review; interpersonal and ED pain management ratings were derived from interviews conducted 1 week post ED visit. A total of 209 interviews by 98 patients were analyzed. Results indicated significant differences among the ED sites on the demographic, clinical, and interpersonal factors. Overall, patients reported being treated with trust and respect by ED clinicians. Adjusted logistic regression analyses indicated that ED clinical site 1 (odds ratio [OR], 10.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-7.36) and being treated with trust and respect by the ED physician (OR, 25.53; 95% CI, 2.07-314.96) predicted good ED pain management ratings. Interpersonal health care experiences may be an important indicator of patient satisfaction and quality of care received by patients with SCD in the ED.
AB - Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) experience painful crises that often require admission to the emergency department (ED) for pain management. Factors such as ED overcrowding and negative perception and stigmatization of SCD may impact patients' perceptions of the quality of pain management in the ED. Data from a multisite prospective cohort study was assessed to determine whether demographic (age and sex), clinical (time to administration of initial analgesia, number of analgesic doses, discharge disposition, and clinical site), or interpersonal factors (separately measured perceptions of being treated with trust and respect by ED triage nurses, nurses, and physicians) were associated with patient ratings of their pain management in the ED. Patients were adults with SCD seen at 3 EDs (2 urban and 1 rural). Demographic and clinical information was derived from medical record review; interpersonal and ED pain management ratings were derived from interviews conducted 1 week post ED visit. A total of 209 interviews by 98 patients were analyzed. Results indicated significant differences among the ED sites on the demographic, clinical, and interpersonal factors. Overall, patients reported being treated with trust and respect by ED clinicians. Adjusted logistic regression analyses indicated that ED clinical site 1 (odds ratio [OR], 10.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-7.36) and being treated with trust and respect by the ED physician (OR, 25.53; 95% CI, 2.07-314.96) predicted good ED pain management ratings. Interpersonal health care experiences may be an important indicator of patient satisfaction and quality of care received by patients with SCD in the ED.
KW - Emergency department
KW - Pain management
KW - Sickle cell disease
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872163295&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872163295&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0027-9684(15)30199-1
DO - 10.1016/S0027-9684(15)30199-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 23342819
AN - SCOPUS:84872163295
SN - 0027-9684
VL - 104
SP - 449
EP - 454
JO - Journal of the National Medical Association
JF - Journal of the National Medical Association
IS - 9-10
ER -