Similarities and differences in undergraduate biomedical engineering curricula in the United States

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Employers, textbook publishers, and existing and emerging educational programs in biomedical engineering and bioengineering continue to be interested in the degree to which the undergraduate curricula of degree granting programs are similar for undergraduates in these fields, and what the similarities are. Several years ago, the VaNTH Engineering Research Center in Bioengineering Educational Technologies compiled information about required courses at 40 of the 43 programs that were ABET-accredited in bioengineering or biomedical engineering at the end of 2004, as well as 31 programs that were not accredited at that time. While these data have been presented in several forums, there has not been a publication on this topic. In the interest of providing data that can be used by different constituencies, as well as a snapshot of the curriculum at a particular point to which changes can be compared, the data from that project are presented here in full. The results from the 2004 sample concerned courses beyond freshman math, physics and chemistry, which tend to be common across engineering majors, to focus on the courses required specifically for the biomedical engineering degree. Mechanics, physiology and design were the subjects required most frequently, at 90% or more of the accredited programs. Other subjects required by 75% or more of the accredited programs were other areas of biology, circuit analysis, computing, statistics, materials, and instrumentation. Several more topics were required by more than half of the programs. There was more variation in the amount of curricular time devoted to different subjects than in the topics that were required. In comparing accredited and non-accredited programs, mechanics, thermodynamics, and materials were required more frequently at accredited programs, while computing and organic chemistry were required by a larger percentage of the non-accredited programs. Normalizing all programs to a credit-hour basis showed that beyond required courses, the median number of credit hours left for specialization or elective courses was 12, and this did not differ between accredited and non-accredited programs. Overall these results showed a high degree of similarity in the required courses across all biomedical engineering programs. The 2013 requirements at sixteen of the programs assessed earlier have been evaluated to determine shifts in the curriculum. While there have been changes in individual programs, the summary statistics reveal few overall shifts in the courses required, reinforcing the relevance of the larger 2004 dataset, and indicating stability in the BME curriculum.

Original languageEnglish (US)
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Event121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: 360 Degrees of Engineering Education - Indianapolis, IN, United States
Duration: Jun 15 2014Jun 18 2014

Other

Other121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: 360 Degrees of Engineering Education
CountryUnited States
CityIndianapolis, IN
Period6/15/146/18/14

Fingerprint

Biomedical engineering
Curricula
Mechanics
Statistics
Educational technology
Engineering research
Textbooks
Physiology
Electric network analysis
Physics
Thermodynamics
Bioengineering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Gatchell, D. W., & Linsenmeier, R. A. (2014). Similarities and differences in undergraduate biomedical engineering curricula in the United States. Paper presented at 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: 360 Degrees of Engineering Education, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Gatchell, David W ; Linsenmeier, Robert A. / Similarities and differences in undergraduate biomedical engineering curricula in the United States. Paper presented at 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: 360 Degrees of Engineering Education, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
@conference{fa4499f74ecd46309b6aecce397d1221,
title = "Similarities and differences in undergraduate biomedical engineering curricula in the United States",
abstract = "Employers, textbook publishers, and existing and emerging educational programs in biomedical engineering and bioengineering continue to be interested in the degree to which the undergraduate curricula of degree granting programs are similar for undergraduates in these fields, and what the similarities are. Several years ago, the VaNTH Engineering Research Center in Bioengineering Educational Technologies compiled information about required courses at 40 of the 43 programs that were ABET-accredited in bioengineering or biomedical engineering at the end of 2004, as well as 31 programs that were not accredited at that time. While these data have been presented in several forums, there has not been a publication on this topic. In the interest of providing data that can be used by different constituencies, as well as a snapshot of the curriculum at a particular point to which changes can be compared, the data from that project are presented here in full. The results from the 2004 sample concerned courses beyond freshman math, physics and chemistry, which tend to be common across engineering majors, to focus on the courses required specifically for the biomedical engineering degree. Mechanics, physiology and design were the subjects required most frequently, at 90{\%} or more of the accredited programs. Other subjects required by 75{\%} or more of the accredited programs were other areas of biology, circuit analysis, computing, statistics, materials, and instrumentation. Several more topics were required by more than half of the programs. There was more variation in the amount of curricular time devoted to different subjects than in the topics that were required. In comparing accredited and non-accredited programs, mechanics, thermodynamics, and materials were required more frequently at accredited programs, while computing and organic chemistry were required by a larger percentage of the non-accredited programs. Normalizing all programs to a credit-hour basis showed that beyond required courses, the median number of credit hours left for specialization or elective courses was 12, and this did not differ between accredited and non-accredited programs. Overall these results showed a high degree of similarity in the required courses across all biomedical engineering programs. The 2013 requirements at sixteen of the programs assessed earlier have been evaluated to determine shifts in the curriculum. While there have been changes in individual programs, the summary statistics reveal few overall shifts in the courses required, reinforcing the relevance of the larger 2004 dataset, and indicating stability in the BME curriculum.",
author = "Gatchell, {David W} and Linsenmeier, {Robert A}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
note = "121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: 360 Degrees of Engineering Education ; Conference date: 15-06-2014 Through 18-06-2014",

}

Gatchell, DW & Linsenmeier, RA 2014, 'Similarities and differences in undergraduate biomedical engineering curricula in the United States' Paper presented at 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: 360 Degrees of Engineering Education, Indianapolis, IN, United States, 6/15/14 - 6/18/14, .

Similarities and differences in undergraduate biomedical engineering curricula in the United States. / Gatchell, David W; Linsenmeier, Robert A.

2014. Paper presented at 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: 360 Degrees of Engineering Education, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Similarities and differences in undergraduate biomedical engineering curricula in the United States

AU - Gatchell, David W

AU - Linsenmeier, Robert A

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Employers, textbook publishers, and existing and emerging educational programs in biomedical engineering and bioengineering continue to be interested in the degree to which the undergraduate curricula of degree granting programs are similar for undergraduates in these fields, and what the similarities are. Several years ago, the VaNTH Engineering Research Center in Bioengineering Educational Technologies compiled information about required courses at 40 of the 43 programs that were ABET-accredited in bioengineering or biomedical engineering at the end of 2004, as well as 31 programs that were not accredited at that time. While these data have been presented in several forums, there has not been a publication on this topic. In the interest of providing data that can be used by different constituencies, as well as a snapshot of the curriculum at a particular point to which changes can be compared, the data from that project are presented here in full. The results from the 2004 sample concerned courses beyond freshman math, physics and chemistry, which tend to be common across engineering majors, to focus on the courses required specifically for the biomedical engineering degree. Mechanics, physiology and design were the subjects required most frequently, at 90% or more of the accredited programs. Other subjects required by 75% or more of the accredited programs were other areas of biology, circuit analysis, computing, statistics, materials, and instrumentation. Several more topics were required by more than half of the programs. There was more variation in the amount of curricular time devoted to different subjects than in the topics that were required. In comparing accredited and non-accredited programs, mechanics, thermodynamics, and materials were required more frequently at accredited programs, while computing and organic chemistry were required by a larger percentage of the non-accredited programs. Normalizing all programs to a credit-hour basis showed that beyond required courses, the median number of credit hours left for specialization or elective courses was 12, and this did not differ between accredited and non-accredited programs. Overall these results showed a high degree of similarity in the required courses across all biomedical engineering programs. The 2013 requirements at sixteen of the programs assessed earlier have been evaluated to determine shifts in the curriculum. While there have been changes in individual programs, the summary statistics reveal few overall shifts in the courses required, reinforcing the relevance of the larger 2004 dataset, and indicating stability in the BME curriculum.

AB - Employers, textbook publishers, and existing and emerging educational programs in biomedical engineering and bioengineering continue to be interested in the degree to which the undergraduate curricula of degree granting programs are similar for undergraduates in these fields, and what the similarities are. Several years ago, the VaNTH Engineering Research Center in Bioengineering Educational Technologies compiled information about required courses at 40 of the 43 programs that were ABET-accredited in bioengineering or biomedical engineering at the end of 2004, as well as 31 programs that were not accredited at that time. While these data have been presented in several forums, there has not been a publication on this topic. In the interest of providing data that can be used by different constituencies, as well as a snapshot of the curriculum at a particular point to which changes can be compared, the data from that project are presented here in full. The results from the 2004 sample concerned courses beyond freshman math, physics and chemistry, which tend to be common across engineering majors, to focus on the courses required specifically for the biomedical engineering degree. Mechanics, physiology and design were the subjects required most frequently, at 90% or more of the accredited programs. Other subjects required by 75% or more of the accredited programs were other areas of biology, circuit analysis, computing, statistics, materials, and instrumentation. Several more topics were required by more than half of the programs. There was more variation in the amount of curricular time devoted to different subjects than in the topics that were required. In comparing accredited and non-accredited programs, mechanics, thermodynamics, and materials were required more frequently at accredited programs, while computing and organic chemistry were required by a larger percentage of the non-accredited programs. Normalizing all programs to a credit-hour basis showed that beyond required courses, the median number of credit hours left for specialization or elective courses was 12, and this did not differ between accredited and non-accredited programs. Overall these results showed a high degree of similarity in the required courses across all biomedical engineering programs. The 2013 requirements at sixteen of the programs assessed earlier have been evaluated to determine shifts in the curriculum. While there have been changes in individual programs, the summary statistics reveal few overall shifts in the courses required, reinforcing the relevance of the larger 2004 dataset, and indicating stability in the BME curriculum.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905196801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905196801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Paper

ER -

Gatchell DW, Linsenmeier RA. Similarities and differences in undergraduate biomedical engineering curricula in the United States. 2014. Paper presented at 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: 360 Degrees of Engineering Education, Indianapolis, IN, United States.