Similarity as an explanatory construct

Steven A. Sloman*, Lance J. Rips

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

52 Scopus citations

Abstract

Theories can be found throughout cognitive science that give an explanatory role to similarity. Such theories can be contrasted with those that model thought using abstract rules. We lay out four possible explanatory roles for similarity. We then review the computational pros and cons of similarity- and rule-based models and outline the empirical work that speaks to the psychological plausibility of the two frameworks. We conclude that an adequate model of human thought must take advantage of both the flexibility of similarity-based inference and the compositionality and certainty associated with rule-based inference.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)87-101
Number of pages15
JournalCognition
Volume65
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1998

Keywords

  • Rule-based inference
  • Similarity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Similarity as an explanatory construct'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this