Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment

Laura Beth Nielsen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The legal consciousness of ordinary citizens concerning offensive public speech is a phenomenon whose legal status has been vigorously debated, but which has received little empirical analysis. This chapter analyzes the legal consciousness of ordinary citizens by examining how experiences with and legal attitudes toward offensive public speech vary by race, gender, and class. It suggests that white women and people of color experience dramatically higher levels of offensive public speech and that these experiences significantly affect their daily lives. Racist and sexist speech generates much debate about the proper balance between freedom of speech and protection of historically disadvantaged groups from verbal abuse. Legal consciousness also refers to how people do not think about the law; that is to say, it is the body of assumptions people have about the law that are simply taken for granted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationTheoretical and Empirical Studies of Rights
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages357-392
Number of pages36
ISBN (Electronic)9781351879804
ISBN (Print)9781315236353
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this