Size Effect on Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete: Is CSCT or MCFT a Viable Alternative to Energy-Based Design Code?

A. Abdullah Dönmez, Christian Carloni, Gianluca Cusatis, Zdeněk P. Bažant*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

After sketching the history of the size effect models for the shear strength of reinforced concrete (RC) in design codes, the energy-based size effect law (SEL), recently incorporated into the American Concrete Institute (ACI) design code articles for beam shear and slab punching, is briefly discussed. A general derivation of the SEL based only on the first principles involving energy conservation and dimensional analysis (or laws of similitude) is presented. Attention is then focused on recent articles that present a severe critique of the SEL and various arguments in support of the Muttoni et al.'s critical shear crack theory (CSCT) - an update of the Collins et al.'s modified compression field theory (MCFT) - that some researchers propose to be introduced into the fib Model Code and the Eurocode as an alternative to the SEL. In a point-by-point analysis, it is shown that this critique and these arguments are incorrect and baseless. It is hoped that the present clarification would lead to progress in design codes, enhancing the safety and efficiency of RC structures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number04020110
JournalJournal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume146
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Mechanical Engineering

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Size Effect on Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete: Is CSCT or MCFT a Viable Alternative to Energy-Based Design Code?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this