Social Network, Surgeon, and Media Influence on the Decision to Undergo Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy

Maria K. Venetis, Erina L. MacGeorge, Dadrie F. Baptiste, Ashton Mouton, Lorin B. Friley, Rebekah Pastor, Kristen Hatten, Janaka Lagoo, Monet W. Bowling, Susan E. Clare*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has risen sharply in the past decade. The current study was designed to examine social network, surgeon, and media influence on patients' CPM decision-making, examining not only who influenced the decision, and to what extent, but also the type of influence exerted. Methods: Patients (N=113) who underwent CPM at 4 Indiana University-affiliated hospitals between 2008 and 2012 completed structured telephone interviews in 2013. Questions addressed the involvement and influence of the social network (family, friends, and nonsurgeon health professionals), surgeon, and media on the CPM decision. Results: Spouses, children, family, friends, and health professionals were reported as exerting a meaningful degree of influence on patients' decisions, largely in ways that were positive or neutral toward CPM. Most surgeons were regarded as providing options rather than encouraging or discouraging CPM. Media influence was present, but limited. Conclusions: Patients who choose CPM do so with influence and support from members of their social networks. Reversing the increasing choice of CPM will require educating these influential others, which can be accomplished by encouraging patients to include them in clinical consultations, and by providing patients with educational materials that can be shared with their social networks. Surgeons need to be perceived as having an opinion, specifically that CPM should be reserved for those patients for whom it is medically indicated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)519-525
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Social Media
Social Support
Prophylactic Mastectomy
Surgeons
Family Health
Spouses
Decision Making
Referral and Consultation
Interviews

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • decision-making
  • prophylactic
  • social networks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Venetis, Maria K. ; MacGeorge, Erina L. ; Baptiste, Dadrie F. ; Mouton, Ashton ; Friley, Lorin B. ; Pastor, Rebekah ; Hatten, Kristen ; Lagoo, Janaka ; Bowling, Monet W. ; Clare, Susan E. / Social Network, Surgeon, and Media Influence on the Decision to Undergo Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy. In: American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials. 2018 ; Vol. 41, No. 6. pp. 519-525.
@article{9151bff49339436f98400a4cd3a619b0,
title = "Social Network, Surgeon, and Media Influence on the Decision to Undergo Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy",
abstract = "Objectives: The rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has risen sharply in the past decade. The current study was designed to examine social network, surgeon, and media influence on patients' CPM decision-making, examining not only who influenced the decision, and to what extent, but also the type of influence exerted. Methods: Patients (N=113) who underwent CPM at 4 Indiana University-affiliated hospitals between 2008 and 2012 completed structured telephone interviews in 2013. Questions addressed the involvement and influence of the social network (family, friends, and nonsurgeon health professionals), surgeon, and media on the CPM decision. Results: Spouses, children, family, friends, and health professionals were reported as exerting a meaningful degree of influence on patients' decisions, largely in ways that were positive or neutral toward CPM. Most surgeons were regarded as providing options rather than encouraging or discouraging CPM. Media influence was present, but limited. Conclusions: Patients who choose CPM do so with influence and support from members of their social networks. Reversing the increasing choice of CPM will require educating these influential others, which can be accomplished by encouraging patients to include them in clinical consultations, and by providing patients with educational materials that can be shared with their social networks. Surgeons need to be perceived as having an opinion, specifically that CPM should be reserved for those patients for whom it is medically indicated.",
keywords = "breast cancer, decision-making, prophylactic, social networks",
author = "Venetis, {Maria K.} and MacGeorge, {Erina L.} and Baptiste, {Dadrie F.} and Ashton Mouton and Friley, {Lorin B.} and Rebekah Pastor and Kristen Hatten and Janaka Lagoo and Bowling, {Monet W.} and Clare, {Susan E.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/COC.0000000000000321",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "519--525",
journal = "American Journal of Clinical Oncology",
issn = "0277-3732",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

Social Network, Surgeon, and Media Influence on the Decision to Undergo Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy. / Venetis, Maria K.; MacGeorge, Erina L.; Baptiste, Dadrie F.; Mouton, Ashton; Friley, Lorin B.; Pastor, Rebekah; Hatten, Kristen; Lagoo, Janaka; Bowling, Monet W.; Clare, Susan E.

In: American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials, Vol. 41, No. 6, 01.01.2018, p. 519-525.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social Network, Surgeon, and Media Influence on the Decision to Undergo Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy

AU - Venetis, Maria K.

AU - MacGeorge, Erina L.

AU - Baptiste, Dadrie F.

AU - Mouton, Ashton

AU - Friley, Lorin B.

AU - Pastor, Rebekah

AU - Hatten, Kristen

AU - Lagoo, Janaka

AU - Bowling, Monet W.

AU - Clare, Susan E.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objectives: The rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has risen sharply in the past decade. The current study was designed to examine social network, surgeon, and media influence on patients' CPM decision-making, examining not only who influenced the decision, and to what extent, but also the type of influence exerted. Methods: Patients (N=113) who underwent CPM at 4 Indiana University-affiliated hospitals between 2008 and 2012 completed structured telephone interviews in 2013. Questions addressed the involvement and influence of the social network (family, friends, and nonsurgeon health professionals), surgeon, and media on the CPM decision. Results: Spouses, children, family, friends, and health professionals were reported as exerting a meaningful degree of influence on patients' decisions, largely in ways that were positive or neutral toward CPM. Most surgeons were regarded as providing options rather than encouraging or discouraging CPM. Media influence was present, but limited. Conclusions: Patients who choose CPM do so with influence and support from members of their social networks. Reversing the increasing choice of CPM will require educating these influential others, which can be accomplished by encouraging patients to include them in clinical consultations, and by providing patients with educational materials that can be shared with their social networks. Surgeons need to be perceived as having an opinion, specifically that CPM should be reserved for those patients for whom it is medically indicated.

AB - Objectives: The rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has risen sharply in the past decade. The current study was designed to examine social network, surgeon, and media influence on patients' CPM decision-making, examining not only who influenced the decision, and to what extent, but also the type of influence exerted. Methods: Patients (N=113) who underwent CPM at 4 Indiana University-affiliated hospitals between 2008 and 2012 completed structured telephone interviews in 2013. Questions addressed the involvement and influence of the social network (family, friends, and nonsurgeon health professionals), surgeon, and media on the CPM decision. Results: Spouses, children, family, friends, and health professionals were reported as exerting a meaningful degree of influence on patients' decisions, largely in ways that were positive or neutral toward CPM. Most surgeons were regarded as providing options rather than encouraging or discouraging CPM. Media influence was present, but limited. Conclusions: Patients who choose CPM do so with influence and support from members of their social networks. Reversing the increasing choice of CPM will require educating these influential others, which can be accomplished by encouraging patients to include them in clinical consultations, and by providing patients with educational materials that can be shared with their social networks. Surgeons need to be perceived as having an opinion, specifically that CPM should be reserved for those patients for whom it is medically indicated.

KW - breast cancer

KW - decision-making

KW - prophylactic

KW - social networks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84980022760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84980022760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/COC.0000000000000321

DO - 10.1097/COC.0000000000000321

M3 - Article

C2 - 27465657

AN - SCOPUS:84980022760

VL - 41

SP - 519

EP - 525

JO - American Journal of Clinical Oncology

JF - American Journal of Clinical Oncology

SN - 0277-3732

IS - 6

ER -