Society of skeletal radiology position paper – recommendations for contrast use in musculoskeletal MRI: when is non-contrast imaging enough?

Jonathan D. Samet*, Hamza Alizai, Majid Chalian, Colleen Costelloe, Swati Deshmukh, Vivek Kalia, Sarah Kamel, Jennifer Ni Mhuircheartaigh, Jimmy Saade, Eric Walker, Daniel Wessell, Laura M. Fayad*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

The following White Paper will discuss the appropriateness of gadolinium administration in MRI for musculoskeletal indications. Musculoskeletal radiologists should consider the potential risks involved and practice the judicious use of intravenous contrast, restricting administration to cases where there is demonstrable added value. Specific nuances of when contrast is or is not recommended are discussed in detail and listed in table format. Briefly, contrast is recommended for bone and soft tissue lesions. For infection, contrast is reserved for chronic or complex cases. In rheumatology, contrast is recommended for early detection but not for advanced arthritis. Contrast is not recommended for sports injuries, routine MRI neurography, implants/hardware, or spine imaging, but is helpful in complex and post-operative cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-115
Number of pages17
JournalSkeletal Radiology
Volume53
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2024

Keywords

  • Contrast use
  • Gadolinium administration
  • MRI

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Society of skeletal radiology position paper – recommendations for contrast use in musculoskeletal MRI: when is non-contrast imaging enough?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this