TY - JOUR
T1 - Soil eaten by chacma baboons adsorbs polar plant secondary metabolites representative of those found in their diet
AU - Ta, Chieu Anh Kim
AU - Pebsworth, Paula A.
AU - Liu, Rui
AU - Hillier, Stephen
AU - Gray, Nia
AU - Arnason, John T.
AU - Young, Sera L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements This work was funded by a Natural Science and Engineering Research Council grant to JT Arnason. We thank Cape Nature and Jennifer Giddy for the opportunity to conduct research in South Africa and Nimal De Silva, Jean Bjornson, and Christopher N. Boddy for assistance with the analytical analyses. We also thank the EGH editor, Professor William Mahaney, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the previous version of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - Geophagy, the deliberate consumption of earth materials, is common among humans and animals. However, its etiology and function(s) remain poorly understood. The major hypotheses about its adaptive functions are the supplementation of essential elements and the protection against temporary and chronic gastrointestinal (GI) distress. Because much less work has been done on the protection hypothesis, we investigated whether soil eaten by baboons protected their GI tract from plant secondary metabolites (PSMs) and described best laboratory practices for doing so. We tested a soil that baboons eat/preferred, a soil that baboons never eat/non-preferred, and two clay minerals, montmorillonite a 2:1 clay and kaolinite a 1:1 clay. These were processed using a technique that simulated physiological digestion. The phytochemical concentration of 10 compounds representative of three biosynthetic classes of compounds found in the baboon diet was then assessed with and without earth materials using high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC–DAD). The preferred soil was white, contained 1% halite, 45% illite/mica, 14% kaolinite, and 0.8% sand; the non-preferred soil was pink, contained 1% goethite and 1% hematite but no halite, 40% illite/mica, 19% kaolinite, and 3% sand. Polar phenolics and alkaloids were generally adsorbed at levels 10× higher than less polar terpenes. In terms of PSM adsorption, the montmorillonite was more effective than the kaolinite, which was more effective than the non-preferred soil, which was more effective than the preferred soil. Our findings suggest that HPLC–DAD is best practice for the assessment of PSM adsorption of earth materials due to its reproducibility and accuracy. Further, soil selection was not based on adsorption of PSMs, but on other criteria such as color, mouth feel, and taste. However, the consumption of earth containing clay minerals could be an effective strategy for protecting the GI tract from PSMs.
AB - Geophagy, the deliberate consumption of earth materials, is common among humans and animals. However, its etiology and function(s) remain poorly understood. The major hypotheses about its adaptive functions are the supplementation of essential elements and the protection against temporary and chronic gastrointestinal (GI) distress. Because much less work has been done on the protection hypothesis, we investigated whether soil eaten by baboons protected their GI tract from plant secondary metabolites (PSMs) and described best laboratory practices for doing so. We tested a soil that baboons eat/preferred, a soil that baboons never eat/non-preferred, and two clay minerals, montmorillonite a 2:1 clay and kaolinite a 1:1 clay. These were processed using a technique that simulated physiological digestion. The phytochemical concentration of 10 compounds representative of three biosynthetic classes of compounds found in the baboon diet was then assessed with and without earth materials using high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC–DAD). The preferred soil was white, contained 1% halite, 45% illite/mica, 14% kaolinite, and 0.8% sand; the non-preferred soil was pink, contained 1% goethite and 1% hematite but no halite, 40% illite/mica, 19% kaolinite, and 3% sand. Polar phenolics and alkaloids were generally adsorbed at levels 10× higher than less polar terpenes. In terms of PSM adsorption, the montmorillonite was more effective than the kaolinite, which was more effective than the non-preferred soil, which was more effective than the preferred soil. Our findings suggest that HPLC–DAD is best practice for the assessment of PSM adsorption of earth materials due to its reproducibility and accuracy. Further, soil selection was not based on adsorption of PSMs, but on other criteria such as color, mouth feel, and taste. However, the consumption of earth containing clay minerals could be an effective strategy for protecting the GI tract from PSMs.
KW - Detoxification
KW - HPLC–DAD
KW - Methods
KW - Pica
KW - Plant toxin adsorption
KW - Simulated digestion
KW - Soil eating
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030555839&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030555839&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10653-017-0025-4
DO - 10.1007/s10653-017-0025-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 28980207
AN - SCOPUS:85030555839
SN - 0269-4042
VL - 40
SP - 803
EP - 813
JO - Environmental Geochemistry and Health
JF - Environmental Geochemistry and Health
IS - 2
ER -