Some further tests of the brief confinement effect and the SSDR account of flooding

Susan Mineka*, Antonio Gino

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations


Although brief confinement in novel or fearful places may occasionally produce flooding-like effects with regard to hastening avoidance response extinction, the results of the three experiments reported here indicate that this is not as robust a phenomenon as is flooding. Experiments 1 and 2 found that any tendency for a brief confinement effect to occur is likely to result from the use of a procedure where extinction is started on the grid floor as opposed to on the ledge of a jump-up box. Experiment 3 found no evidence at all that confinement in either a novel or a fearful place can hasten the extinction of a more well-learned jump-up response than that studied in previous experiments, even when the grids extinction procedure was used. Overall these results do not support the SSDR account of flooding, which has derived its chief support from experiments demonstrating a brief confinement effect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)98-115
Number of pages18
JournalLearning and Motivation
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 1979

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology


Dive into the research topics of 'Some further tests of the brief confinement effect and the SSDR account of flooding'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this