Sourcing native plants to support ecosystem function in different planting contexts

Andrea L T Kramer*, Barbara Crane, Jeff Downing, J. L. Hamrick, Kayri Havens, Amy Highland, Sarah K. Jacobi, Thomas N. Kaye, Eric V. Lonsdorf, Jennifer Ramp Neale, Ari Novy, Peter E. Smouse, Douglas W. Tallamy, Abigail White, Jacob Zeldin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Current guidance on sourcing native plants to support ecosystem function focuses on the high risk of failure when unsuitable material is used in ecological restoration. However, there is growing recognition that risks may be lower and rewards higher at highly disturbed sites isolated from remnant populations, especially when considering support for pollinators, wildlife, and other ecosystem functions. We developed the first decision support tool using expert opinion to assess suitability of different native plant sources, including horticultural cultivars, in two different planting contexts. We assessed the suitability of 761 sources for 72 commonly sold native species in two different planting contexts (small, isolated, highly disturbed sites vs. large, undisturbed sites near remnant populations). Information on genetic and adaptive backgrounds of sources was strikingly lacking, forcing us to exclude one-third of sources from our assessment. While only 3% of cultivars received high suitability scores for use in large, undisturbed sites near remnant populations, 52% received high suitability scores in small, isolated, highly disturbed sites. However, nearly 25% of cultivars had floral or leaf traits that differed from wild plants in ways that may compromise their ability to support pollinators and other wildlife. Forbs and cultivars lacking genetic diversity and source information were most likely to have altered traits. We recommend that native plant breeders and sellers work together to ensure ecosystem function, adaptation, and diversity information is available to consumers, that consumers request this information to drive demand, and that researchers further investigate how context influences risks and benefits of different sources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)470-476
Number of pages7
JournalRestoration Ecology
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2019

Keywords

  • disturbed habitat
  • ecological restoration
  • horticultural cultivar
  • native plants supporting pollinators and wildlife
  • seed sourcing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Sourcing native plants to support ecosystem function in different planting contexts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Kramer, A. L. T., Crane, B., Downing, J., Hamrick, J. L., Havens, K., Highland, A., Jacobi, S. K., Kaye, T. N., Lonsdorf, E. V., Ramp Neale, J., Novy, A., Smouse, P. E., Tallamy, D. W., White, A., & Zeldin, J. (2019). Sourcing native plants to support ecosystem function in different planting contexts. Restoration Ecology, 27(3), 470-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12931