Spatially organizing biochemistry

Choosing a strategy to translate synthetic biology to the factory

Christopher M. Jakobson, Danielle Tullman Ercek, Niall M Mangan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Natural biochemical systems are ubiquitously organized both in space and time. Engineering the spatial organization of biochemistry has emerged as a key theme of synthetic biology, with numerous technologies promising improved biosynthetic pathway performance. One strategy, however, may produce disparate results for different biosynthetic pathways. We use a spatially resolved kinetic model to explore this fundamental design choice in systems and synthetic biology. We predict that two example biosynthetic pathways have distinct optimal organization strategies that vary based on pathway-dependent and cell-extrinsic factors. Moreover, we demonstrate that the optimal design varies as a function of kinetic and biophysical properties, as well as culture conditions. Our results suggest that organizing biosynthesis has the potential to substantially improve performance, but that choosing the appropriate strategy is key. The flexible design-space analysis we propose can be adapted to diverse biosynthetic pathways, and lays a foundation to rationally choose organization strategies for biosynthesis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number8196
JournalScientific reports
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Synthetic Biology
Biosynthetic Pathways
Biochemistry
Systems Biology
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

@article{467e95b8ff01421fa4a5444e8b8f9692,
title = "Spatially organizing biochemistry: Choosing a strategy to translate synthetic biology to the factory",
abstract = "Natural biochemical systems are ubiquitously organized both in space and time. Engineering the spatial organization of biochemistry has emerged as a key theme of synthetic biology, with numerous technologies promising improved biosynthetic pathway performance. One strategy, however, may produce disparate results for different biosynthetic pathways. We use a spatially resolved kinetic model to explore this fundamental design choice in systems and synthetic biology. We predict that two example biosynthetic pathways have distinct optimal organization strategies that vary based on pathway-dependent and cell-extrinsic factors. Moreover, we demonstrate that the optimal design varies as a function of kinetic and biophysical properties, as well as culture conditions. Our results suggest that organizing biosynthesis has the potential to substantially improve performance, but that choosing the appropriate strategy is key. The flexible design-space analysis we propose can be adapted to diverse biosynthetic pathways, and lays a foundation to rationally choose organization strategies for biosynthesis.",
author = "Jakobson, {Christopher M.} and Ercek, {Danielle Tullman} and Mangan, {Niall M}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-018-26399-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
issn = "2045-2322",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

Spatially organizing biochemistry : Choosing a strategy to translate synthetic biology to the factory. / Jakobson, Christopher M.; Ercek, Danielle Tullman; Mangan, Niall M.

In: Scientific reports, Vol. 8, No. 1, 8196, 01.12.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatially organizing biochemistry

T2 - Choosing a strategy to translate synthetic biology to the factory

AU - Jakobson, Christopher M.

AU - Ercek, Danielle Tullman

AU - Mangan, Niall M

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Natural biochemical systems are ubiquitously organized both in space and time. Engineering the spatial organization of biochemistry has emerged as a key theme of synthetic biology, with numerous technologies promising improved biosynthetic pathway performance. One strategy, however, may produce disparate results for different biosynthetic pathways. We use a spatially resolved kinetic model to explore this fundamental design choice in systems and synthetic biology. We predict that two example biosynthetic pathways have distinct optimal organization strategies that vary based on pathway-dependent and cell-extrinsic factors. Moreover, we demonstrate that the optimal design varies as a function of kinetic and biophysical properties, as well as culture conditions. Our results suggest that organizing biosynthesis has the potential to substantially improve performance, but that choosing the appropriate strategy is key. The flexible design-space analysis we propose can be adapted to diverse biosynthetic pathways, and lays a foundation to rationally choose organization strategies for biosynthesis.

AB - Natural biochemical systems are ubiquitously organized both in space and time. Engineering the spatial organization of biochemistry has emerged as a key theme of synthetic biology, with numerous technologies promising improved biosynthetic pathway performance. One strategy, however, may produce disparate results for different biosynthetic pathways. We use a spatially resolved kinetic model to explore this fundamental design choice in systems and synthetic biology. We predict that two example biosynthetic pathways have distinct optimal organization strategies that vary based on pathway-dependent and cell-extrinsic factors. Moreover, we demonstrate that the optimal design varies as a function of kinetic and biophysical properties, as well as culture conditions. Our results suggest that organizing biosynthesis has the potential to substantially improve performance, but that choosing the appropriate strategy is key. The flexible design-space analysis we propose can be adapted to diverse biosynthetic pathways, and lays a foundation to rationally choose organization strategies for biosynthesis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047876692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047876692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-018-26399-0

DO - 10.1038/s41598-018-26399-0

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

IS - 1

M1 - 8196

ER -