TY - JOUR
T1 - Standardized pain flowsheet
T2 - impact on patient-reported pain experiences after cardiovascular surgery.
AU - Voigt, L.
AU - Paice, J. A.
AU - Pouliot, J.
PY - 1995/7
Y1 - 1995/7
N2 - BACKGROUND: Administration of analgesics per patient request or random pain assessments may provide inadequate pain management. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of nurses' use of a standardized pain flowsheet to document pain assessment and pharmacologic management on patient-reported pain intensity. METHODS: A pre-post intervention design was used to compare 61 patients. In the preimplementation group, traditional charting of pain presence or absence was documented in the narrative notes and pharmacologic management was recorded on the medication profile. In the postimplementation group, the intensity of pain and pharmacologic management were documented on a pain flowsheet. Within 24 hours after transfer to the step-down unit, patients were interviewed regarding pain intensity experienced in the surgical heart unit and at the time of questioning. The distribution of these pain intensity scores was compared. RESULTS: The postimplementation group reported significantly lower pain intensity ratings for the average amount of pain experienced while in the surgical heart unit, the least amount of pain experienced while in the surgical heart unit, and the pain experienced at the moment of questioning. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a standardized pain flowsheet to assess pain intensity and document pharmacologic intervention may improve pain management in postsurgical cardiovascular patients.
AB - BACKGROUND: Administration of analgesics per patient request or random pain assessments may provide inadequate pain management. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of nurses' use of a standardized pain flowsheet to document pain assessment and pharmacologic management on patient-reported pain intensity. METHODS: A pre-post intervention design was used to compare 61 patients. In the preimplementation group, traditional charting of pain presence or absence was documented in the narrative notes and pharmacologic management was recorded on the medication profile. In the postimplementation group, the intensity of pain and pharmacologic management were documented on a pain flowsheet. Within 24 hours after transfer to the step-down unit, patients were interviewed regarding pain intensity experienced in the surgical heart unit and at the time of questioning. The distribution of these pain intensity scores was compared. RESULTS: The postimplementation group reported significantly lower pain intensity ratings for the average amount of pain experienced while in the surgical heart unit, the least amount of pain experienced while in the surgical heart unit, and the pain experienced at the moment of questioning. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a standardized pain flowsheet to assess pain intensity and document pharmacologic intervention may improve pain management in postsurgical cardiovascular patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029339556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029339556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4037/ajcc1995.4.4.308
DO - 10.4037/ajcc1995.4.4.308
M3 - Article
C2 - 7663595
AN - SCOPUS:0029339556
SN - 1062-3264
VL - 4
SP - 308
EP - 313
JO - American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses
JF - American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses
IS - 4
ER -