Step Up - Not on - The Step 2 Clinical Skills Exam: Directors of Clinical Skills Courses (DOCS) Oppose Ending Step 2 CS

David J. Ecker, Felise B. Milan, Todd Cassese, Jeanne M. Farnan, Wendy S. Madigosky, F. Stanford Massie, Paul Mendez, Sharon Obadia, Robin K. Ovitsh, Ronald Silvestri, Toshiko Uchida, Michelle Daniel

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recently, a student-initiated movement to end the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 Clinical Skills and the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination Level 2-Performance Evaluation has gained momentum. These are the only national licensing examinations designed to assess clinical skills competence in the stepwise process through which physicians gain licensure and certification. Therefore, the movement to end these examinations and the ensuing debate merit careful consideration. The authors, elected representatives of the Directors of Clinical Skills Courses, an organization comprising clinical skills educators in the United States and beyond, believe abolishing the national clinical skills examinations would have a major negative impact on the clinical skills training of medical students, and that forfeiting a national clinical skills competency standard has the potential to diminish the quality of care provided to patients. In this Perspective, the authors offer important additional background information, outline key concerns regarding the consequences of ending these national clinical skills examinations, and provide recommendations for moving forward: reducing the costs for students, exploring alternatives, increasing the value and transparency of the current examinations, recognizing and enhancing the strengths of the current examinations, and engaging in a national dialogue about the issue.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)693-698
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume93
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

director
examination
transparency
certification
medical student
student
dialogue
physician
educator
organization
costs
evaluation
performance
Values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Ecker, D. J., Milan, F. B., Cassese, T., Farnan, J. M., Madigosky, W. S., Massie, F. S., ... Daniel, M. (2018). Step Up - Not on - The Step 2 Clinical Skills Exam: Directors of Clinical Skills Courses (DOCS) Oppose Ending Step 2 CS. Academic Medicine, 93(5), 693-698. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001874
Ecker, David J. ; Milan, Felise B. ; Cassese, Todd ; Farnan, Jeanne M. ; Madigosky, Wendy S. ; Massie, F. Stanford ; Mendez, Paul ; Obadia, Sharon ; Ovitsh, Robin K. ; Silvestri, Ronald ; Uchida, Toshiko ; Daniel, Michelle. / Step Up - Not on - The Step 2 Clinical Skills Exam : Directors of Clinical Skills Courses (DOCS) Oppose Ending Step 2 CS. In: Academic Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 93, No. 5. pp. 693-698.
@article{82ee2d0316724cd485507f17ca297f05,
title = "Step Up - Not on - The Step 2 Clinical Skills Exam: Directors of Clinical Skills Courses (DOCS) Oppose Ending Step 2 CS",
abstract = "Recently, a student-initiated movement to end the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 Clinical Skills and the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination Level 2-Performance Evaluation has gained momentum. These are the only national licensing examinations designed to assess clinical skills competence in the stepwise process through which physicians gain licensure and certification. Therefore, the movement to end these examinations and the ensuing debate merit careful consideration. The authors, elected representatives of the Directors of Clinical Skills Courses, an organization comprising clinical skills educators in the United States and beyond, believe abolishing the national clinical skills examinations would have a major negative impact on the clinical skills training of medical students, and that forfeiting a national clinical skills competency standard has the potential to diminish the quality of care provided to patients. In this Perspective, the authors offer important additional background information, outline key concerns regarding the consequences of ending these national clinical skills examinations, and provide recommendations for moving forward: reducing the costs for students, exploring alternatives, increasing the value and transparency of the current examinations, recognizing and enhancing the strengths of the current examinations, and engaging in a national dialogue about the issue.",
author = "Ecker, {David J.} and Milan, {Felise B.} and Todd Cassese and Farnan, {Jeanne M.} and Madigosky, {Wendy S.} and Massie, {F. Stanford} and Paul Mendez and Sharon Obadia and Ovitsh, {Robin K.} and Ronald Silvestri and Toshiko Uchida and Michelle Daniel",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000001874",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "693--698",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

Ecker, DJ, Milan, FB, Cassese, T, Farnan, JM, Madigosky, WS, Massie, FS, Mendez, P, Obadia, S, Ovitsh, RK, Silvestri, R, Uchida, T & Daniel, M 2018, 'Step Up - Not on - The Step 2 Clinical Skills Exam: Directors of Clinical Skills Courses (DOCS) Oppose Ending Step 2 CS' Academic Medicine, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 693-698. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001874

Step Up - Not on - The Step 2 Clinical Skills Exam : Directors of Clinical Skills Courses (DOCS) Oppose Ending Step 2 CS. / Ecker, David J.; Milan, Felise B.; Cassese, Todd; Farnan, Jeanne M.; Madigosky, Wendy S.; Massie, F. Stanford; Mendez, Paul; Obadia, Sharon; Ovitsh, Robin K.; Silvestri, Ronald; Uchida, Toshiko; Daniel, Michelle.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 93, No. 5, 01.05.2018, p. 693-698.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Step Up - Not on - The Step 2 Clinical Skills Exam

T2 - Directors of Clinical Skills Courses (DOCS) Oppose Ending Step 2 CS

AU - Ecker, David J.

AU - Milan, Felise B.

AU - Cassese, Todd

AU - Farnan, Jeanne M.

AU - Madigosky, Wendy S.

AU - Massie, F. Stanford

AU - Mendez, Paul

AU - Obadia, Sharon

AU - Ovitsh, Robin K.

AU - Silvestri, Ronald

AU - Uchida, Toshiko

AU - Daniel, Michelle

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Recently, a student-initiated movement to end the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 Clinical Skills and the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination Level 2-Performance Evaluation has gained momentum. These are the only national licensing examinations designed to assess clinical skills competence in the stepwise process through which physicians gain licensure and certification. Therefore, the movement to end these examinations and the ensuing debate merit careful consideration. The authors, elected representatives of the Directors of Clinical Skills Courses, an organization comprising clinical skills educators in the United States and beyond, believe abolishing the national clinical skills examinations would have a major negative impact on the clinical skills training of medical students, and that forfeiting a national clinical skills competency standard has the potential to diminish the quality of care provided to patients. In this Perspective, the authors offer important additional background information, outline key concerns regarding the consequences of ending these national clinical skills examinations, and provide recommendations for moving forward: reducing the costs for students, exploring alternatives, increasing the value and transparency of the current examinations, recognizing and enhancing the strengths of the current examinations, and engaging in a national dialogue about the issue.

AB - Recently, a student-initiated movement to end the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 Clinical Skills and the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination Level 2-Performance Evaluation has gained momentum. These are the only national licensing examinations designed to assess clinical skills competence in the stepwise process through which physicians gain licensure and certification. Therefore, the movement to end these examinations and the ensuing debate merit careful consideration. The authors, elected representatives of the Directors of Clinical Skills Courses, an organization comprising clinical skills educators in the United States and beyond, believe abolishing the national clinical skills examinations would have a major negative impact on the clinical skills training of medical students, and that forfeiting a national clinical skills competency standard has the potential to diminish the quality of care provided to patients. In this Perspective, the authors offer important additional background information, outline key concerns regarding the consequences of ending these national clinical skills examinations, and provide recommendations for moving forward: reducing the costs for students, exploring alternatives, increasing the value and transparency of the current examinations, recognizing and enhancing the strengths of the current examinations, and engaging in a national dialogue about the issue.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053887805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053887805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001874

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001874

M3 - Review article

VL - 93

SP - 693

EP - 698

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 5

ER -