Stereotypes as Judgmental Heuristics: Evidence of Circadian Variations in Discrimination

Galen V. Bodenhausen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

366 Scopus citations

Abstract

The question of when people rely on stereotypic preconceptions in judging others was investigated in two studies. As a person's motivation or ability to process information systematically is diminished, the person may rely to an increasing extent on stereotypes, when available, as a way of simplifying the task of generating a response. It was hypothesized that circadian variations in arousal levels would be related to social perceivers' propensity to stereotype others by virtue of their effects on motivation and processing capacity. In support of this hypothesis, subjects exhibited stereotypic biases in their judgments to a much greater extent when the judgments were rendered at a nonoptimal time of day (i.e., in the morning for “night people” and in the evening for “morning people”). In Study One, this pattern was found in probability judgments concerning personal characteristics; in Study Two, the pattern was obtained in perceptions of guilt in allegations of student misbehavior. Results generalized over a range of different types of social stereotypes and suggest that biological processes should be considered in attempts to conceptualize the determinants of stereotyping.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)319-322
Number of pages4
JournalPsychological Science
Volume1
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1990

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stereotypes as Judgmental Heuristics: Evidence of Circadian Variations in Discrimination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this