TY - JOUR
T1 - Stigmatization and Mental Health Impact of Chronic Pediatric Skin Disorders
AU - Pediatric Dermatology Research Alliance
AU - Paller, Amy
AU - Cislo, Stephanie Marie
AU - Chamlin, Sarah L.
AU - Hajek, Aleena
AU - Phan, Sheshanna
AU - Hogeling, Marcia
AU - Castelo-Soccio, Leslie
AU - Lara-Corrales, Irene
AU - Arkin, Lisa
AU - Lawley, Leslie P.
AU - Funk, Tracy
AU - Castro Porto Silva Lopes, Fabiana
AU - Antaya, Richard J.
AU - Ramien, Michele L.
AU - Vivar, Karina L.
AU - Teng, Joyce
AU - Coughlin, Carrie C.
AU - Rehmus, Wingfield
AU - Gupta, Deepti
AU - Bercovitch, Lionel
AU - Stein, Sarah L.
AU - Boull, Christina
AU - Tom, Wynnis L.
AU - Liang, Marilyn G.
AU - Hunt, Raegan
AU - Luu, Minnelly
AU - Holland, Kristen E.
AU - Schoch, Jennifer J.
AU - Cella, David
AU - Lai, Jin Shei
AU - Griffith, James W
AU - Afifi, Ladan
AU - Bahl, Aanchal
AU - Bice, Danielle
AU - Bruckner, Anna
AU - Canter, Talia
AU - Cheng, Carole
AU - Diaz, Lucia
AU - Dupuy, Elizabeth
AU - Drolet, Beth
AU - Fadzeyeva, Hanna
AU - Fernandez, Esteban
AU - Glick, Sharon
AU - Harfmann, Katya
AU - Hawryluk, Elena B.
AU - Hughes, Meagan
AU - Humphrey, Stephen
AU - Huynh, Thy
AU - Jones, Madison
AU - Kruse, Lacey
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/6/19
Y1 - 2024/6/19
N2 - Importance: Chronic skin disorders in children frequently are visible and can cause stigmatization. However, the extent of stigmatization from chronic skin disease and association with mental health needs further study. Objective: To examine the extent of stigma, dependence on disease visibility and severity, and association with mental health and quality of life (QOL) in chronic pediatric skin disease. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional, single-visit study was conducted at 32 pediatric dermatology centers in the US and Canada from November 14, 2018, to November 17, 2021. Participants included patients aged 8 to 17 years with chronic skin disease and 1 parent. Main Outcomes and Measures: Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Instrumentation System (PROMIS) Stigma-Skin, the extent of stigma with child-, caregiver-, and physician-assessed disease visibility (primary outcome) and severity was compared, as well as reduced QOL (assessed by Skindex-Teen), depression, anxiety, and poor peer relationships (PROMIS child and proxy tools) (secondary outcomes). Results: The study included 1671 children (57.9% female; mean [SD] age, 13.7 [2.7] years). A total of 56.4% participants had self-reported high disease visibility and 50.5% had moderate disease severity. Stigma scores significantly differed by level of physician-assessed and child/proxy-assessed disease visibility and severity. Among children with chronic skin disorders, predominantly acne, atopic dermatitis, alopecia areata, and vitiligo, only 27.0% had T scores less than 40 (minimal or no stigma) and 43.8% had at least moderate stigma (T score ≥45) compared with children with a range of chronic diseases. Stigma scores correlated strongly with reduced QOL (Spearman ρ = 0.73), depression (ρ = 0.61), anxiety (ρ = 0.54), and poor peer relationships (ρ = -0.49). Overall, 29.4% of parents were aware of bullying of their child, which was strongly associated with stigma (Cohen d = -0.79, with children who were not bullied experiencing lower levels of stigma). Girls reported more stigma than boys (Cohen d = 0.26). Children with hyperhidrosis and hidradenitis suppurativa were most likely to have increased depression and anxiety. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that physician assessment of disease severity and visibility is insufficient to evaluate the disease impact in the patient/caregiver. Identifying stigmatization, including bullying, and tracking improvement through medical and psychosocial interventions may be a key role for practitioners.
AB - Importance: Chronic skin disorders in children frequently are visible and can cause stigmatization. However, the extent of stigmatization from chronic skin disease and association with mental health needs further study. Objective: To examine the extent of stigma, dependence on disease visibility and severity, and association with mental health and quality of life (QOL) in chronic pediatric skin disease. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional, single-visit study was conducted at 32 pediatric dermatology centers in the US and Canada from November 14, 2018, to November 17, 2021. Participants included patients aged 8 to 17 years with chronic skin disease and 1 parent. Main Outcomes and Measures: Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Instrumentation System (PROMIS) Stigma-Skin, the extent of stigma with child-, caregiver-, and physician-assessed disease visibility (primary outcome) and severity was compared, as well as reduced QOL (assessed by Skindex-Teen), depression, anxiety, and poor peer relationships (PROMIS child and proxy tools) (secondary outcomes). Results: The study included 1671 children (57.9% female; mean [SD] age, 13.7 [2.7] years). A total of 56.4% participants had self-reported high disease visibility and 50.5% had moderate disease severity. Stigma scores significantly differed by level of physician-assessed and child/proxy-assessed disease visibility and severity. Among children with chronic skin disorders, predominantly acne, atopic dermatitis, alopecia areata, and vitiligo, only 27.0% had T scores less than 40 (minimal or no stigma) and 43.8% had at least moderate stigma (T score ≥45) compared with children with a range of chronic diseases. Stigma scores correlated strongly with reduced QOL (Spearman ρ = 0.73), depression (ρ = 0.61), anxiety (ρ = 0.54), and poor peer relationships (ρ = -0.49). Overall, 29.4% of parents were aware of bullying of their child, which was strongly associated with stigma (Cohen d = -0.79, with children who were not bullied experiencing lower levels of stigma). Girls reported more stigma than boys (Cohen d = 0.26). Children with hyperhidrosis and hidradenitis suppurativa were most likely to have increased depression and anxiety. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that physician assessment of disease severity and visibility is insufficient to evaluate the disease impact in the patient/caregiver. Identifying stigmatization, including bullying, and tracking improvement through medical and psychosocial interventions may be a key role for practitioners.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85191840834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85191840834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.0594
DO - 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.0594
M3 - Article
C2 - 38656377
AN - SCOPUS:85191840834
SN - 2168-6068
VL - 160
SP - 621
EP - 630
JO - JAMA dermatology
JF - JAMA dermatology
IS - 6
ER -