Strategic maneuvering in political argumentation

David H Zarefsky*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although political argumentation is not institutionalized in a formal sense, it does have recurrent patterns and characteristics. Its constraints include the absence of time limits, the lack of a clear terminus, heterogeneous audiences, and the assumption that access is open to all. These constraints make creative strategic maneuvering both possible and necessary. Among the common types of strategic maneuvering are changing the subject, modifying the relevant audience, appealing to liberal and conservative presumptions, reframing the argument, using condensation symbols, employing the locus of the irreparable, and argumentative use of figures and tropes. It is difficult to evaluate strategic maneuvering in political argumentation, however, because the activity types dictate wide latitude for the arguers, so there are few cases of unquestionable derailment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)317-330
Number of pages14
JournalArgumentation
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2008

Keywords

  • Campaigns
  • Framing
  • Political argumentation
  • Presidential debates
  • Strategic maneuvering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Strategic maneuvering in political argumentation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this