TY - JOUR
T1 - Strategies, actions, and outcomes of pilot state programs in public health genomics, 2003-2008
AU - Pierre, Jeanette St
AU - Bach, Janice
AU - Duquette, Debra
AU - Oehlke, Kristen
AU - Nystrom, Robert
AU - Silvey, Kerry
AU - Zlot, Amy
AU - Giles, Rebecca
AU - Johnson, Jenny
AU - Mack Anders, H.
AU - Gwinn, Marta
AU - Bowen, Scott
AU - Khoury, Muin J.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - State health departments in Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon, and Utah explored the use of genomic information, including family health history, in chronic diseaseprevention programs. To support these explorations, the Office of Public Health Genomics at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provided cooperative agreement funds from 2003 through 2008. The 4 states' chronic disease programs identified advocates, formed partnerships, and assessed public data; they integrated genomics into existing state plans for genetics and chronic disease prevention; they developed projects focused on prevention of asthma,cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and other chronic conditions; and they created educational curricula and materials for health workers, policymakers, and the public. Each state's program was different because of the need to adapt to existing culture, infrastructure, and resources, yet all were able to enhance their chronic disease prevention programs with the use of family health history, a low-tech "genomic tool." Additional states are drawing on the experience of these 4 states to develop their ownapproaches.
AB - State health departments in Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon, and Utah explored the use of genomic information, including family health history, in chronic diseaseprevention programs. To support these explorations, the Office of Public Health Genomics at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provided cooperative agreement funds from 2003 through 2008. The 4 states' chronic disease programs identified advocates, formed partnerships, and assessed public data; they integrated genomics into existing state plans for genetics and chronic disease prevention; they developed projects focused on prevention of asthma,cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and other chronic conditions; and they created educational curricula and materials for health workers, policymakers, and the public. Each state's program was different because of the need to adapt to existing culture, infrastructure, and resources, yet all were able to enhance their chronic disease prevention programs with the use of family health history, a low-tech "genomic tool." Additional states are drawing on the experience of these 4 states to develop their ownapproaches.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943528935&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943528935&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5888/pcd11.130267
DO - 10.5888/pcd11.130267
M3 - Article
C2 - 24921900
AN - SCOPUS:84943528935
SN - 1545-1151
VL - 11
JO - Preventing chronic disease
JF - Preventing chronic disease
M1 - 130267
ER -