Structural alignment in dialogue and monologue (and what attention may have to do with it)

Iva Ivanova*, William S Horton, Benjamin Swets, Daniel Kleinman, Victor S. Ferreira

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the Interactive Alignment Theory, alignment is promoted by dialogic features on a dialogue-monologue continuum. More alignment in prototypical dialogue (a chat among friends) than in prototypical monologue (a lecture) seems plausible, but the role of other dialogic features for alignment is less clear. The current study tests the joint influence of two such features: communicative intent and a live interlocutor. Four structural priming experiments contrasted the magnitude of structural alignment between a dialogue situation that involved a joint task and an otherwise identical monologue situation that lacked a communicative component. None of the four experiments showed any statistical differences in alignment between dialogue and monologue. Post-hoc analyses on the pooled data of Experiments 2–4 further suggested that individual differences in attention (operationalized through reaction time variability in the picture verification component of the task we used to elicit alignment) might modulate overall structural alignment, and that dialogue (presumably through sustaining attention) might be able to sustain alignment over time to a greater extent than monologue. These results suggest a role for attention in supporting structural alignment, but the lack of clear differences between alignment magnitudes in monologue and dialogue (absent in individual experiments and weak even in the pooled analyses) suggests that communicative intent and a physically-present interlocutor have at best a minor role in promoting alignment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number104052
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume110
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2020

Fingerprint

dialogue
Joints
experiment
Individuality
Reaction Time
joint tasks
chat
Monologue
Alignment
Experiments
lack
present
time
Experiment

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Communication
  • Dative alternation
  • Joint task
  • Structural priming

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

Ivanova, Iva ; Horton, William S ; Swets, Benjamin ; Kleinman, Daniel ; Ferreira, Victor S. / Structural alignment in dialogue and monologue (and what attention may have to do with it). In: Journal of Memory and Language. 2020 ; Vol. 110.
@article{fec9c3b3bf9d4a7e96fc54ff61e97897,
title = "Structural alignment in dialogue and monologue (and what attention may have to do with it)",
abstract = "In the Interactive Alignment Theory, alignment is promoted by dialogic features on a dialogue-monologue continuum. More alignment in prototypical dialogue (a chat among friends) than in prototypical monologue (a lecture) seems plausible, but the role of other dialogic features for alignment is less clear. The current study tests the joint influence of two such features: communicative intent and a live interlocutor. Four structural priming experiments contrasted the magnitude of structural alignment between a dialogue situation that involved a joint task and an otherwise identical monologue situation that lacked a communicative component. None of the four experiments showed any statistical differences in alignment between dialogue and monologue. Post-hoc analyses on the pooled data of Experiments 2–4 further suggested that individual differences in attention (operationalized through reaction time variability in the picture verification component of the task we used to elicit alignment) might modulate overall structural alignment, and that dialogue (presumably through sustaining attention) might be able to sustain alignment over time to a greater extent than monologue. These results suggest a role for attention in supporting structural alignment, but the lack of clear differences between alignment magnitudes in monologue and dialogue (absent in individual experiments and weak even in the pooled analyses) suggests that communicative intent and a physically-present interlocutor have at best a minor role in promoting alignment.",
keywords = "Attention, Communication, Dative alternation, Joint task, Structural priming",
author = "Iva Ivanova and Horton, {William S} and Benjamin Swets and Daniel Kleinman and Ferreira, {Victor S.}",
year = "2020",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jml.2019.104052",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "110",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Structural alignment in dialogue and monologue (and what attention may have to do with it). / Ivanova, Iva; Horton, William S; Swets, Benjamin; Kleinman, Daniel; Ferreira, Victor S.

In: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 110, 104052, 01.02.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structural alignment in dialogue and monologue (and what attention may have to do with it)

AU - Ivanova, Iva

AU - Horton, William S

AU - Swets, Benjamin

AU - Kleinman, Daniel

AU - Ferreira, Victor S.

PY - 2020/2/1

Y1 - 2020/2/1

N2 - In the Interactive Alignment Theory, alignment is promoted by dialogic features on a dialogue-monologue continuum. More alignment in prototypical dialogue (a chat among friends) than in prototypical monologue (a lecture) seems plausible, but the role of other dialogic features for alignment is less clear. The current study tests the joint influence of two such features: communicative intent and a live interlocutor. Four structural priming experiments contrasted the magnitude of structural alignment between a dialogue situation that involved a joint task and an otherwise identical monologue situation that lacked a communicative component. None of the four experiments showed any statistical differences in alignment between dialogue and monologue. Post-hoc analyses on the pooled data of Experiments 2–4 further suggested that individual differences in attention (operationalized through reaction time variability in the picture verification component of the task we used to elicit alignment) might modulate overall structural alignment, and that dialogue (presumably through sustaining attention) might be able to sustain alignment over time to a greater extent than monologue. These results suggest a role for attention in supporting structural alignment, but the lack of clear differences between alignment magnitudes in monologue and dialogue (absent in individual experiments and weak even in the pooled analyses) suggests that communicative intent and a physically-present interlocutor have at best a minor role in promoting alignment.

AB - In the Interactive Alignment Theory, alignment is promoted by dialogic features on a dialogue-monologue continuum. More alignment in prototypical dialogue (a chat among friends) than in prototypical monologue (a lecture) seems plausible, but the role of other dialogic features for alignment is less clear. The current study tests the joint influence of two such features: communicative intent and a live interlocutor. Four structural priming experiments contrasted the magnitude of structural alignment between a dialogue situation that involved a joint task and an otherwise identical monologue situation that lacked a communicative component. None of the four experiments showed any statistical differences in alignment between dialogue and monologue. Post-hoc analyses on the pooled data of Experiments 2–4 further suggested that individual differences in attention (operationalized through reaction time variability in the picture verification component of the task we used to elicit alignment) might modulate overall structural alignment, and that dialogue (presumably through sustaining attention) might be able to sustain alignment over time to a greater extent than monologue. These results suggest a role for attention in supporting structural alignment, but the lack of clear differences between alignment magnitudes in monologue and dialogue (absent in individual experiments and weak even in the pooled analyses) suggests that communicative intent and a physically-present interlocutor have at best a minor role in promoting alignment.

KW - Attention

KW - Communication

KW - Dative alternation

KW - Joint task

KW - Structural priming

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073013558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073013558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2019.104052

DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2019.104052

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85073013558

VL - 110

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

M1 - 104052

ER -