Subject evaluation in social experiments

Tomas Philipson, Larry V. Hedges

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper analyzes how self-interested subjects, as opposed to altruistic investigators, evaluate treatments in social experiments. We argue that the attrition behavior of subjects reveals their evaluation of treatments, and we discuss the usefulness of using such data in performing subject-based evaluation. We examine the possible causes of disagreements between investigators and subjects in their evaluation of treatments, and empirically assess the extent to which they disagree. Given that disagreements between subject evaluation and evaluation done by investigators could be due to sampling error, this paper provides an empirical framework for estimating the systematic level of disagreement in the presence of such errors. We illustrate this framework by estimating the extent of disagreement in clinical trials, and we find substantial evidence of over-approval by investigators in about one-third of the trials analyzed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)381-408
Number of pages28
JournalEconometrica
Volume66
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1998

Keywords

  • Attrition
  • Econometrics
  • Health care evaluation
  • Social experiments
  • Subjects

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Subject evaluation in social experiments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this