Subsequent pregnancy after gestational diabetes mellitus

Soo Heon Kwak, Hae Sung Kim, Sung Hee Choi, Soo Lim, Young Min Cho, Kyong Soo Park, Hak C. Jang, Moon Young Kim, Nam H. Cho, Boyd E. Metzger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations


OBJECTIVE - The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of recurrent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and to find risk factors that can predict the recurrence of GDM in Korean women with previous GDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - We evaluated women who had GDM in an index pregnancy (1993-2001) and a subsequent pregnancy by 2003. An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed during the index pregnancy and 2 months postpartum. The recurrence rate of GDM was assessed among 111 women who had a subsequent pregnancy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of recurrent GDM. RESULTS - The frequency of recurrent GDM in subsequent pregnancies was 45.0% (95% CI 35.6-54.4%). Women with impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance 2 months postpartum were at increased risk for recurrent GDM (relative risk 2.31, 95% CI 1.24-4.30). Higher BMI before the subsequent pregnancy (P = 0.024), higher fasting glucose concentration (P = 0.007) 2 months postpartum, and lower 1-h insulin concentration (P =0.004) of the diagnostic OGTT in the index pregnancy were independent risk factors for recurrence of GDM in subsequent pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS - GDM recurred in nearly half of subsequent pregnancies in Korean women. Fasting glucose 2 months postpartum might be a clinically valuable predictor of recurrent GDM risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1867-1871
Number of pages5
JournalDiabetes care
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing


Dive into the research topics of 'Subsequent pregnancy after gestational diabetes mellitus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this