Sulfur isotope systematics of a euxinic, low-sulfate lake: Evaluating the importance of the reservoir effect in modern and ancient oceans

Maya L. Gomes*, Matthew T. Hurtgen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

70 Scopus citations

Abstract

The sulfur (S) isotope difference between sedimentary sulfate and sulfide phases preserved in sedimentary rocks (Δ34S) has been utilized to reconstruct marine sulfate concentrations and inferentially the redox evolution of Earth's surface. These interpretations are largely based on experimental studies that indicate that microbial sulfate reduction is accompanied by a substantial kinetic isotope effect (up to 66‰), but only at sulfate concentrations >~200μM. In this study, we examine S isotope systematics in a modern, low-sulfate euxinic lake (~100-350M) and find that the calculated kinetic isotope effect associated with microbial sulfate reduction (34S) is relatively large (~23.5‰), but preserved Δ34S values are considerably smaller (4.7‰-9.9‰).Δ34S values in this system are controlled by the fraction of the sulfate reservoir that is consumed during sulfate reduction and the location of pyrite formation. This reservoir effect strongly influences the S isotope composition of sulfide preserved in the rock record such that Δ34S values increase as a function of sulfate levels, even when sulfate concentrations are >200μM and the kinetic isotope effect is expressed. These findings have important implications for reconstructing the chemical evolution of the ocean-atmosphere system throughout Earth history-not just for the Precambrian

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)663-666
Number of pages4
JournalGeology
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Sulfur isotope systematics of a euxinic, low-sulfate lake: Evaluating the importance of the reservoir effect in modern and ancient oceans'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this