TY - JOUR
T1 - Supporting Teen Problem-Solving (STEPS) 3 year outcomes
T2 - Preventing diabetes-specific emotional distress and depressive symptoms in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
AU - Weissberg-Benchell, Jill
AU - Shapiro, Jenna B.
AU - Bryant, Fred B.
AU - Hood, Korey K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Psychological Association
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Objective: This article reports the 3-year outcomes for the Supporting Teen Problem-Solving (STePS) multisite Randomized Control Trial (RCT); reporting the overall impact of the STePS trial, and the differential impact of each arm of the trial (a resilience promoting intervention [PRP T1D] vs. a diabetes education intervention [EI]) on diabetes-specific emotional distress and depressive symptoms. Method: Participants included 264 adolescents with Type 1 diabetes (T1D), ages 14–18, in Chicago and San Francisco. Both intervention arms lasted 4.5 months and assessments were conducted at baseline, postintervention (4.5 months), and 5 follow-up visits (8, 12, 16, 28, and 40 months from baseline). Intervention efficacy was investigated using latent growth curve modeling (LGCM) to analyze the rate and shape of change of outcomes from preintervention across postintervention and follow-up time points. Results: Mean age of participants was 15.7 years, mean T1D duration was 6.9 years, mean HbA1c at baseline was 9.1%. The sample was diverse with nearly 35% identifying as racial or ethnic minorities, and 60% were female. PRP T1D participants reported significantly lower diabetes distress compared with EI participants, and the effect size increased over time. For the pooled sample, while 40% of youth reported elevated distress at baseline, only 23% reported elevated distress 3 years postintervention. Moreover, PRP T1D participants experienced a significant decline in depressive symptoms from 16 to 40 months postbaseline, while participants in the education arm did not. Conclusions: Results from the 3-year outcomes assessment demonstrate the robust effects of PRP T1D in adolescents with declines in distress and depressive symptoms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)What is the public health significance of this article?—This study suggests that PRP T1D is an effective treatment for reducing diabetes-specific emotional distress in teenagers with T1D. This study suggests that PRP T1D is an effective treatment for preventing depressive symptoms in teenagers with T1D. This study suggests that group-based programs designed for teenagers with T1D may offer a positive psychosocial and metabolic impact regardless of group content.
AB - Objective: This article reports the 3-year outcomes for the Supporting Teen Problem-Solving (STePS) multisite Randomized Control Trial (RCT); reporting the overall impact of the STePS trial, and the differential impact of each arm of the trial (a resilience promoting intervention [PRP T1D] vs. a diabetes education intervention [EI]) on diabetes-specific emotional distress and depressive symptoms. Method: Participants included 264 adolescents with Type 1 diabetes (T1D), ages 14–18, in Chicago and San Francisco. Both intervention arms lasted 4.5 months and assessments were conducted at baseline, postintervention (4.5 months), and 5 follow-up visits (8, 12, 16, 28, and 40 months from baseline). Intervention efficacy was investigated using latent growth curve modeling (LGCM) to analyze the rate and shape of change of outcomes from preintervention across postintervention and follow-up time points. Results: Mean age of participants was 15.7 years, mean T1D duration was 6.9 years, mean HbA1c at baseline was 9.1%. The sample was diverse with nearly 35% identifying as racial or ethnic minorities, and 60% were female. PRP T1D participants reported significantly lower diabetes distress compared with EI participants, and the effect size increased over time. For the pooled sample, while 40% of youth reported elevated distress at baseline, only 23% reported elevated distress 3 years postintervention. Moreover, PRP T1D participants experienced a significant decline in depressive symptoms from 16 to 40 months postbaseline, while participants in the education arm did not. Conclusions: Results from the 3-year outcomes assessment demonstrate the robust effects of PRP T1D in adolescents with declines in distress and depressive symptoms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)What is the public health significance of this article?—This study suggests that PRP T1D is an effective treatment for reducing diabetes-specific emotional distress in teenagers with T1D. This study suggests that PRP T1D is an effective treatment for preventing depressive symptoms in teenagers with T1D. This study suggests that group-based programs designed for teenagers with T1D may offer a positive psychosocial and metabolic impact regardless of group content.
KW - Type I Diabetes
KW - adolescents
KW - depression
KW - distress
KW - prevention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095398339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85095398339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/ccp0000608
DO - 10.1037/ccp0000608
M3 - Article
C2 - 33136423
AN - SCOPUS:85095398339
SN - 0022-006X
VL - 88
SP - 1019
EP - 1031
JO - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
JF - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
IS - 11
ER -