Surface Feeling, or What Ephemerality Does to Reading in Hazlitt, Hogarth, and Keats

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This essay takes up ephemeral timescales in Romantic aesthetics in order to question how reading practices engage with the spatial figure of a “surface.” My point of departure is William Hazlitt, but the essay draws an arc from Hazlitt’s interest in William Hogarth (looking, in the process, at his The Analysis of Beauty) to the marked influence of Hazlitt’s aesthetic principles of ephemerality and wit on the writing of John Keats. The essay concludes by reading between Keats’s digressively ephemeral epistolary style, and several of the Odes in which ephemerality serves the poet as a figure of both threat and promise. I argue that the meeting of Hazlitt, Hogarth, and Keats enables us to think about reading practices as different ways of feeling surfaces.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)349-360
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Romantic Review
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 4 2017

Fingerprint

aesthetics
beauty
writer
threat
Reading Practices
Ephemeral
Ephemerality
John Keats
Aesthetics
Poet
William Hogarth
Ordinary Differential Equations
Threat
William Hazlitt
Wit
Time Scales

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this

@article{ce61bb4c4bdc41d3871dbee29320fad5,
title = "Surface Feeling, or What Ephemerality Does to Reading in Hazlitt, Hogarth, and Keats",
abstract = "This essay takes up ephemeral timescales in Romantic aesthetics in order to question how reading practices engage with the spatial figure of a “surface.” My point of departure is William Hazlitt, but the essay draws an arc from Hazlitt’s interest in William Hogarth (looking, in the process, at his The Analysis of Beauty) to the marked influence of Hazlitt’s aesthetic principles of ephemerality and wit on the writing of John Keats. The essay concludes by reading between Keats’s digressively ephemeral epistolary style, and several of the Odes in which ephemerality serves the poet as a figure of both threat and promise. I argue that the meeting of Hazlitt, Hogarth, and Keats enables us to think about reading practices as different ways of feeling surfaces.",
author = "Wolff, {Tristram Nash}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/10509585.2017.1314676",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "349--360",
journal = "European Romantic Review",
issn = "1050-9585",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Surface Feeling, or What Ephemerality Does to Reading in Hazlitt, Hogarth, and Keats. / Wolff, Tristram Nash.

In: European Romantic Review, Vol. 28, No. 3, 04.05.2017, p. 349-360.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surface Feeling, or What Ephemerality Does to Reading in Hazlitt, Hogarth, and Keats

AU - Wolff, Tristram Nash

PY - 2017/5/4

Y1 - 2017/5/4

N2 - This essay takes up ephemeral timescales in Romantic aesthetics in order to question how reading practices engage with the spatial figure of a “surface.” My point of departure is William Hazlitt, but the essay draws an arc from Hazlitt’s interest in William Hogarth (looking, in the process, at his The Analysis of Beauty) to the marked influence of Hazlitt’s aesthetic principles of ephemerality and wit on the writing of John Keats. The essay concludes by reading between Keats’s digressively ephemeral epistolary style, and several of the Odes in which ephemerality serves the poet as a figure of both threat and promise. I argue that the meeting of Hazlitt, Hogarth, and Keats enables us to think about reading practices as different ways of feeling surfaces.

AB - This essay takes up ephemeral timescales in Romantic aesthetics in order to question how reading practices engage with the spatial figure of a “surface.” My point of departure is William Hazlitt, but the essay draws an arc from Hazlitt’s interest in William Hogarth (looking, in the process, at his The Analysis of Beauty) to the marked influence of Hazlitt’s aesthetic principles of ephemerality and wit on the writing of John Keats. The essay concludes by reading between Keats’s digressively ephemeral epistolary style, and several of the Odes in which ephemerality serves the poet as a figure of both threat and promise. I argue that the meeting of Hazlitt, Hogarth, and Keats enables us to think about reading practices as different ways of feeling surfaces.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019642438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019642438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10509585.2017.1314676

DO - 10.1080/10509585.2017.1314676

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 349

EP - 360

JO - European Romantic Review

JF - European Romantic Review

SN - 1050-9585

IS - 3

ER -