Abstract
Annual surgeon case volume has been linked to patient outcome in a variety of surgical fields, although limited data focus on gynecologic surgery performed by general gynecologists. Herein we review the literature addressing the associations between intraoperative injury, postoperative morbidity, and resource use among surgeons performing a low vs high volume of hysterectomies. Although study design and populations differ, individual and composite morbidity outcomes consistently favored high-volume surgeons. Given the growing emphasis on competency-based evaluation in surgery, gynecology departments may soon consider volume requirements a component of privileging.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 554-561 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 2013 |
Keywords
- Hysterectomy
- Operative outcomes
- Surgeon volume
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Obstetrics and Gynecology