Surgical and trauma care in low- and middle-income countries: a review of capacity assessments

Kevin J. Blair*, Lorenzo Paladino, Pamela L. Shaw, Michael B. Shapiro, Benedict C. Nwomeh, Mamta Swaroop

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Surgical and trauma capacity assessments help guide resource allocation and plan interventions to improve care for the injured in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To forge expert consensus on conducting these assessments, we undertook a systematic review of studies using five tools: (1) World Health Organization's (WHO) Guidelines for Essential Trauma Care, (2) WHO's Tool for Situational Analysis to Assess Emergency and Essential Surgical Care, (3) Personnel, Infrastructure, Procedures, Equipment, and Supplies tool, (4) Harvard Humanitarian Initiative tool, and (5) Emergency and Critical Care tool. Materials and methods Publications describing utilization of survey instruments to assess surgical or trauma capacity in LMICs were reviewed. Included articles underwent thematic analysis to develop recommendations. A modified Delphi method was used to establish expert consensus. Experts rated recommendations on a Likert-type scale via online survey. Consensus was defined by Cronbach's α ≥ 0.80. Recommendations achieving agreement by ≥80% of experts were included. Results Two hundred and ninety-eight publications were identified and 41 included, describing evaluation of 1170 facilities across 36 LMICs. Nine recommendations were agreed upon by expert consensus: (1) inclusion of district hospitals, (2) inclusion of highest level public hospital, (3) inclusion of private facilities, (4) facility visits for on-site completion, (5) direct inspections, (6) checking surgical logs, (7) adaptation of survey instrument, (8) repeat assessments, and (9) need for increased collaboration. Conclusions Expert recommendations developed in this review describe methodology to be employed when conducting assessments of surgical and trauma capacity in LMICs. Consensus has yet to be achieved for tool selection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)139-151
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume210
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Keywords

  • Capacity
  • Essential surgery
  • Global surgery
  • LMIC
  • Trauma
  • Trauma system development

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Surgical and trauma care in low- and middle-income countries: a review of capacity assessments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this