TY - JOUR
T1 - Surgical intervention of nonvertebral osseous metastasis
AU - Attar, Samer
AU - Steffner, Robert J.
AU - Avedian, Raffi
AU - Hussain, Waqas M.
PY - 2012/4
Y1 - 2012/4
N2 - Background: Nonvertebral osseous metastases can result in pain and disability. The goals of surgical intervention are to reduce pain and to improve function if nonsurgical treatment fails. The indications for proceeding with surgical intervention depend on anatomic location, amount of local destruction, extent of skeletal and visceral disease and, most important, the patient's performance status and life expectancy. Methods: This article reviews the evaluation and treatment of metastatic nonvertebral osseous lesions from the perspective of the orthopedic surgeon, based mainly on an assessment of the surgical literature. Results: This article summarizes the approaches to preoperative evaluation, patient selection, and medical optimization. Guidelines for estimating osseous stability and fracture risk are discussed, and surgical implants and their relation to postoperative outcomes are examined. This review also describes less invasive ablative procedures currently available. Conclusions: The surgical management of nonvertebral osseous metastases involves multidisciplinary collaboration. The surgical construct must be a stable, reliable, and durable intervention that is individually tailored and matched to a patient's prognosis and performance status.
AB - Background: Nonvertebral osseous metastases can result in pain and disability. The goals of surgical intervention are to reduce pain and to improve function if nonsurgical treatment fails. The indications for proceeding with surgical intervention depend on anatomic location, amount of local destruction, extent of skeletal and visceral disease and, most important, the patient's performance status and life expectancy. Methods: This article reviews the evaluation and treatment of metastatic nonvertebral osseous lesions from the perspective of the orthopedic surgeon, based mainly on an assessment of the surgical literature. Results: This article summarizes the approaches to preoperative evaluation, patient selection, and medical optimization. Guidelines for estimating osseous stability and fracture risk are discussed, and surgical implants and their relation to postoperative outcomes are examined. This review also describes less invasive ablative procedures currently available. Conclusions: The surgical management of nonvertebral osseous metastases involves multidisciplinary collaboration. The surgical construct must be a stable, reliable, and durable intervention that is individually tailored and matched to a patient's prognosis and performance status.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859471228&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859471228&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/107327481201900205
DO - 10.1177/107327481201900205
M3 - Review article
C2 - 22487973
AN - SCOPUS:84859471228
SN - 1073-2748
VL - 19
SP - 113
EP - 121
JO - Cancer Control
JF - Cancer Control
IS - 2
ER -