Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II

Dean Assimos, Amy Krambeck, Nicole L. Miller, Manoj Monga, M. Hassan Murad, Caleb P. Nelson, Kenneth T. Pace, Vernon M. Pais, Margaret S. Pearle, Glenn M. Preminger, Hassan Razvi, Ojas Shah, Brian R. Matlaga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

445 Scopus citations


Purpose This Guideline is intended to provide a clinical framework for the surgical management of patients with kidney and/or ureteral stones. The summary presented herein represents Part II of the two-part series dedicated to Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline. Please refer to Part I for introductory information and a discussion of pre-operative imaging and special cases. Materials and Methods A systematic review of the literature (search dates 1/1/1985 to 5/31/2015) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed studies relevant to the surgical management of stones. The review yielded an evidence base of 1,911 articles after application of inclusion/exclusion criteria. These publications were used to create the Guideline statements. Evidence-based statements of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendation were developed based on benefits and risks/burdens to patients. Additional directives are provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions when insufficient evidence existed. Results The Panel identified 12 adult Index Patients to represent the most common cases seen in clinical practice. Three additional Index Patients were also created to describe the more commonly encountered special cases, including pediatric and pregnant patients. With these patients in mind, Guideline statements were developed to aid the clinician in identifying optimal management. Conclusions Proper treatment selection, which is directed by patient- and stone-specific factors, remains the greatest predictor of successful treatment outcomes. This Guideline is intended for use in conjunction with the individual patient's treatment goals. In all cases, patient preferences and personal goals should be considered when choosing a management strategy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1161-1169
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Urology
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016


  • nephrolithiasis
  • nephrostomy, percutaneous
  • ureteroscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology


Dive into the research topics of 'Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this