Survey of helmet influences of female pillions in New Delhi

Selma Siddiqui, Sumant Arora, John Peipert, Sushma Sagar, Marie Crandall, Mamta Swaroop*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In India, female motorized two-wheeler users involved in road traffic accidents account for 70,000 injuries and fatalities annually. Despite federal helmet laws, New Delhi exempted female pillion riders (backseat passengers) from mandatory helmet usage in response to religious and cultural opposition. This study attempts to elucidate factors influencing female pillion riders' helmet usage, hypothesizing religious-based opposition and poor understanding of helmet efficacy. Materials and methods: A cross-section of female pillion riders in five areas of New Delhi were approached by trained surveyors. Surveys were self-completed (n = 52) or completed with assistance (n=243).Demographics,helmet usehabits,opinions, andmedia influencedatawere collected. Datawere analyzed using x2, Fisher exact test, and multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of 305 women surveyed, 69.8% were Hindus (n = 213), 10.8% Muslims (n = 33), and 10.4% Sikhs (n = 32). More Muslim (33.3%, P = 0.001) and Sikh (25%, P = 0.04) women opposed mandatory helmet use compared with Hindu women (10.6%). There were 66 women who self-reported helmet use, with one woman (Sikh) who abstained from helmets for religious practices (0.9%). The most common reason for helmet disuse was discomfort (n = 40, 36.7%). Most respondents reported media positively influenced helmet use (57.7%). Conclusions: Despite arguments of infringement on religious rights, women pillions ride without helmets for comfort and appearance purposes primarily. Furthermore, though significantly fewer Sikh and Muslim women support mandatory helmet laws, supporters remain a clear majority in both groups. Most women report media outlets as influential on helmet use, principally television, suggesting that mass media campaigns may improve helmet compliance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)404-410
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume184
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Head Protective Devices
Islam
Surveys and Questionnaires
Mass Media
Women's Rights
Traffic Accidents
Television

Keywords

  • Helmet use
  • Motorized-two-wheeler
  • Pillion riders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Siddiqui, Selma ; Arora, Sumant ; Peipert, John ; Sagar, Sushma ; Crandall, Marie ; Swaroop, Mamta. / Survey of helmet influences of female pillions in New Delhi. In: Journal of Surgical Research. 2013 ; Vol. 184, No. 1. pp. 404-410.
@article{c8db319cd0744e26a80c7033acf71bc2,
title = "Survey of helmet influences of female pillions in New Delhi",
abstract = "Background: In India, female motorized two-wheeler users involved in road traffic accidents account for 70,000 injuries and fatalities annually. Despite federal helmet laws, New Delhi exempted female pillion riders (backseat passengers) from mandatory helmet usage in response to religious and cultural opposition. This study attempts to elucidate factors influencing female pillion riders' helmet usage, hypothesizing religious-based opposition and poor understanding of helmet efficacy. Materials and methods: A cross-section of female pillion riders in five areas of New Delhi were approached by trained surveyors. Surveys were self-completed (n = 52) or completed with assistance (n=243).Demographics,helmet usehabits,opinions, andmedia influencedatawere collected. Datawere analyzed using x2, Fisher exact test, and multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of 305 women surveyed, 69.8{\%} were Hindus (n = 213), 10.8{\%} Muslims (n = 33), and 10.4{\%} Sikhs (n = 32). More Muslim (33.3{\%}, P = 0.001) and Sikh (25{\%}, P = 0.04) women opposed mandatory helmet use compared with Hindu women (10.6{\%}). There were 66 women who self-reported helmet use, with one woman (Sikh) who abstained from helmets for religious practices (0.9{\%}). The most common reason for helmet disuse was discomfort (n = 40, 36.7{\%}). Most respondents reported media positively influenced helmet use (57.7{\%}). Conclusions: Despite arguments of infringement on religious rights, women pillions ride without helmets for comfort and appearance purposes primarily. Furthermore, though significantly fewer Sikh and Muslim women support mandatory helmet laws, supporters remain a clear majority in both groups. Most women report media outlets as influential on helmet use, principally television, suggesting that mass media campaigns may improve helmet compliance.",
keywords = "Helmet use, Motorized-two-wheeler, Pillion riders",
author = "Selma Siddiqui and Sumant Arora and John Peipert and Sushma Sagar and Marie Crandall and Mamta Swaroop",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.103",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "184",
pages = "404--410",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Research",
issn = "0022-4804",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Survey of helmet influences of female pillions in New Delhi. / Siddiqui, Selma; Arora, Sumant; Peipert, John; Sagar, Sushma; Crandall, Marie; Swaroop, Mamta.

In: Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 184, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 404-410.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Survey of helmet influences of female pillions in New Delhi

AU - Siddiqui, Selma

AU - Arora, Sumant

AU - Peipert, John

AU - Sagar, Sushma

AU - Crandall, Marie

AU - Swaroop, Mamta

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Background: In India, female motorized two-wheeler users involved in road traffic accidents account for 70,000 injuries and fatalities annually. Despite federal helmet laws, New Delhi exempted female pillion riders (backseat passengers) from mandatory helmet usage in response to religious and cultural opposition. This study attempts to elucidate factors influencing female pillion riders' helmet usage, hypothesizing religious-based opposition and poor understanding of helmet efficacy. Materials and methods: A cross-section of female pillion riders in five areas of New Delhi were approached by trained surveyors. Surveys were self-completed (n = 52) or completed with assistance (n=243).Demographics,helmet usehabits,opinions, andmedia influencedatawere collected. Datawere analyzed using x2, Fisher exact test, and multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of 305 women surveyed, 69.8% were Hindus (n = 213), 10.8% Muslims (n = 33), and 10.4% Sikhs (n = 32). More Muslim (33.3%, P = 0.001) and Sikh (25%, P = 0.04) women opposed mandatory helmet use compared with Hindu women (10.6%). There were 66 women who self-reported helmet use, with one woman (Sikh) who abstained from helmets for religious practices (0.9%). The most common reason for helmet disuse was discomfort (n = 40, 36.7%). Most respondents reported media positively influenced helmet use (57.7%). Conclusions: Despite arguments of infringement on religious rights, women pillions ride without helmets for comfort and appearance purposes primarily. Furthermore, though significantly fewer Sikh and Muslim women support mandatory helmet laws, supporters remain a clear majority in both groups. Most women report media outlets as influential on helmet use, principally television, suggesting that mass media campaigns may improve helmet compliance.

AB - Background: In India, female motorized two-wheeler users involved in road traffic accidents account for 70,000 injuries and fatalities annually. Despite federal helmet laws, New Delhi exempted female pillion riders (backseat passengers) from mandatory helmet usage in response to religious and cultural opposition. This study attempts to elucidate factors influencing female pillion riders' helmet usage, hypothesizing religious-based opposition and poor understanding of helmet efficacy. Materials and methods: A cross-section of female pillion riders in five areas of New Delhi were approached by trained surveyors. Surveys were self-completed (n = 52) or completed with assistance (n=243).Demographics,helmet usehabits,opinions, andmedia influencedatawere collected. Datawere analyzed using x2, Fisher exact test, and multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of 305 women surveyed, 69.8% were Hindus (n = 213), 10.8% Muslims (n = 33), and 10.4% Sikhs (n = 32). More Muslim (33.3%, P = 0.001) and Sikh (25%, P = 0.04) women opposed mandatory helmet use compared with Hindu women (10.6%). There were 66 women who self-reported helmet use, with one woman (Sikh) who abstained from helmets for religious practices (0.9%). The most common reason for helmet disuse was discomfort (n = 40, 36.7%). Most respondents reported media positively influenced helmet use (57.7%). Conclusions: Despite arguments of infringement on religious rights, women pillions ride without helmets for comfort and appearance purposes primarily. Furthermore, though significantly fewer Sikh and Muslim women support mandatory helmet laws, supporters remain a clear majority in both groups. Most women report media outlets as influential on helmet use, principally television, suggesting that mass media campaigns may improve helmet compliance.

KW - Helmet use

KW - Motorized-two-wheeler

KW - Pillion riders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884675471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884675471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.103

DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.103

M3 - Article

C2 - 23838385

AN - SCOPUS:84884675471

VL - 184

SP - 404

EP - 410

JO - Journal of Surgical Research

JF - Journal of Surgical Research

SN - 0022-4804

IS - 1

ER -