TY - JOUR
T1 - Sustainment of a complex culturally competent care intervention for Hispanic living donor kidney transplantation
T2 - A longitudinal analysis of adaptations
AU - Gordon, Elisa J.
AU - Uriarte, Jefferson J.
AU - Anderson, Naomi
AU - Smith, Justin Dean
AU - Caicedo, Juan Carlos
AU - Shumate, Michelle
N1 - Funding Information:
NIDDK funded this research (1R01DK104876 to EJ Gordon and JC Caicedo, Co-PIs).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Association for Clinical and Translational Science.
PY - 2022/3/28
Y1 - 2022/3/28
N2 - Introduction: Sustainment refers to continued intervention delivery over time, while continuing to produce intended outcomes, often with ongoing adaptations, which are purposeful changes to the design or delivery of an intervention to improve its fit or effectiveness. The Hispanic Kidney Transplant Program (HKTP), a complex, culturally competent intervention, was implemented in two transplant programs to reduce disparities in Hispanic/Latinx living donor kidney transplant rates. This study longitudinally examined the influence of adaptations on HKTP sustainment. Methods: Qualitative interviews, learning collaborative calls, and telephone meetings with physicians, administrators, and staff (n = 55) were conducted over three years of implementation to identify HKTP adaptations. The Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded was used to classify adaptation types and frequency, which were compared across sites over time. Results: Across sites, more adaptations were made in the first year (n = 47), then fell and plateaued in the two remaining years (n = 35). Adaptations at Site-A were consistent across years (2017: n = 18, 2018: n = 17, 2019: n = 14), while Site-B made considerably fewer adaptations after the first year (2017: n = 29, 2018: n = 18, 2019: n = 21). Both sites proportionally made mostly skipping (32%), adding (20%), tweaking (20%), and substituting (16%) adaptation types. Skipping- and substituting-type adaptations were made due to institutional structural characteristics and lack of available resources, respectively. However, Site-A's greater proportion of skipping-type adaptations was attributed to greater system complexity, and Site-B's greater proportion of adding-type adaptation was attributed to the egalitarian team-based culture. Conclusion: Our findings can help prepare implementers to expect certain context-specific adaptations and preemptively avoid those that hinder sustainment.
AB - Introduction: Sustainment refers to continued intervention delivery over time, while continuing to produce intended outcomes, often with ongoing adaptations, which are purposeful changes to the design or delivery of an intervention to improve its fit or effectiveness. The Hispanic Kidney Transplant Program (HKTP), a complex, culturally competent intervention, was implemented in two transplant programs to reduce disparities in Hispanic/Latinx living donor kidney transplant rates. This study longitudinally examined the influence of adaptations on HKTP sustainment. Methods: Qualitative interviews, learning collaborative calls, and telephone meetings with physicians, administrators, and staff (n = 55) were conducted over three years of implementation to identify HKTP adaptations. The Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded was used to classify adaptation types and frequency, which were compared across sites over time. Results: Across sites, more adaptations were made in the first year (n = 47), then fell and plateaued in the two remaining years (n = 35). Adaptations at Site-A were consistent across years (2017: n = 18, 2018: n = 17, 2019: n = 14), while Site-B made considerably fewer adaptations after the first year (2017: n = 29, 2018: n = 18, 2019: n = 21). Both sites proportionally made mostly skipping (32%), adding (20%), tweaking (20%), and substituting (16%) adaptation types. Skipping- and substituting-type adaptations were made due to institutional structural characteristics and lack of available resources, respectively. However, Site-A's greater proportion of skipping-type adaptations was attributed to greater system complexity, and Site-B's greater proportion of adding-type adaptation was attributed to the egalitarian team-based culture. Conclusion: Our findings can help prepare implementers to expect certain context-specific adaptations and preemptively avoid those that hinder sustainment.
KW - CFIR
KW - Equity
KW - FRAME
KW - Fidelity
KW - Health disparities
KW - Implementation science
KW - Interview
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128289976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85128289976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/cts.2022.378
DO - 10.1017/cts.2022.378
M3 - Article
C2 - 35574156
AN - SCOPUS:85128289976
SN - 2059-8661
VL - 6
JO - Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
JF - Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
IS - 1
M1 - e38
ER -