Abstract
Autonomous active exploration requires search algorithms that can effectively balance the need for workspace coverage with energetic costs. We present a strategy for planning optimal search trajectories with respect to the distribution of expected information over a workspace. We formulate an iterative optimal control algorithm for general nonlinear dynamics, where the metric for information gain is the difference between the spatial distribution and the statistical representation of the time-averaged trajectory, i.e. ergodicity. Previous work has designed a continuous-time trajectory optimization algorithm. In this paper, we derive two discrete-time iterative trajectory optimization approaches, one based on standard first-order discretization and the other using symplectic integration. The discrete-time methods based on first-order discretization techniques are both faster than the continuous-time method in the studied examples. Moreover, we show that even for a simple system, the choice of discretization has a dramatic impact on the resulting control and state trajectories. While the standard discretization method turns unstable, the symplectic method, which is structure-preserving, achieves lower values for the objective.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Title of host publication | 54rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control,CDC 2015 |
Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. |
Pages | 2594-2600 |
Number of pages | 7 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781479978861 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 8 2015 |
Event | 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, CDC 2015 - Osaka, Japan Duration: Dec 15 2015 → Dec 18 2015 |
Publication series
Name | Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control |
---|---|
ISSN (Print) | 0743-1546 |
ISSN (Electronic) | 2576-2370 |
Other
Other | 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, CDC 2015 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Japan |
City | Osaka |
Period | 12/15/15 → 12/18/15 |
Funding
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant CMMI 1334609. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Control and Systems Engineering
- Modeling and Simulation
- Control and Optimization