Symptom scores: mumbo jumbo or meaningful measures?

A. Christopher Stage*, John C. Hairston

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations


Instruments designed to assess the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms have become a routine component of the diagnostic evaluation of men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Several validated tools have been developed to this end, including the International Prostate Symptom Score, which is used most commonly today. Despite attempts to correlate symptom score severity with commonly measured objective parameters of BPH, no clear relationships have been found. The reason for this is likely multifactorial and suggests a complex relationship among subjective and objective variables. However, symptom scores show a good correlation with the patient's perception of quality of life and degree of bother. This is critical because the decision to treat should be largely based on these subjective variables. Moreover, symptom scores have been shown to represent a meaningful endpoint in assessing treatment response in clinical studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-256
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent urology reports
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology


Dive into the research topics of 'Symptom scores: mumbo jumbo or meaningful measures?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this