Systematic review with meta-analysis: Faecal diversion for management of perianal Crohn's disease

S. Singh*, N. S. Ding, K. L. Mathis, P. S. Dulai, A. M. Farrell, J. H. Pemberton, A. L. Hart, W. J. Sandborn, E. V. Loftus

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

153 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Temporary faecal diversion is sometimes used for management of refractory perianal Crohn's disease (CD) with variable success. Aims To perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness, long-term outcomes and factors associated with success of temporary faecal diversion for perianal CD. Methods Through a systematic literature review through 15 July 2015, we identified 16 cohort studies (556 patients) reporting outcomes after temporary faecal diversion. We estimated pooled rates [with 95% confidence interval (CI)] of early clinical response, attempted and successful restoration of bowel continuity after temporary faecal diversion (without symptomatic relapse), and rates of re-diversion (in patients with attempted restoration) and proctectomy (with or without colectomy and end-ileostomy). We identified factors associated with successful restoration of bowel continuity. Results On meta-analysis, 63.8% (95% CI: 54.1-72.5) of patients had early clinical response after faecal diversion for refractory perianal CD. Restoration of bowel continuity was attempted in 34.5% (95% CI: 27.0-42.8) of patients, and was successful in only 16.6% (95% CI: 11.8-22.9). Of those in whom restoration was attempted, 26.5% (95% CI: 14.1-44.2) required re-diversion because of severe relapse. Overall, 41.6% (95% CI: 32.6-51.2) of patients required proctectomy after failure of temporary faecal diversion. There was no difference in the successful restoration of bowel continuity after temporary faecal diversion in the pre-biological or biological era (13.7% vs. 17.6%, P = 0.60), in part due to selection bias. Absence of rectal involvement was the most consistent factor associated with restoration of bowel continuity. Conclusions Temporary faecal diversion may improve symptoms in approximately two-thirds of patients with refractory perianal Crohn's disease, but bowel restoration is successful in only 17% of patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)783-792
Number of pages10
JournalAlimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Volume42
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic review with meta-analysis: Faecal diversion for management of perianal Crohn's disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this