TY - JOUR
T1 - Systemic lupus international collaborating clinics renal activity/response exercise
T2 - Development of a renal activity score and renal response index
AU - Petri, Michelle
AU - Kasitanon, Nuntana
AU - Lee, Shin Seok
AU - Link, Kimberly
AU - Magder, Laurence
AU - Bae, Sang Cheol
AU - Hanly, John G.
AU - Isenberg, David A.
AU - Nived, Ola
AU - Sturfelt, Gunnar
AU - Van Vollenhoven, Ronald
AU - Wallace, Daniel J.
AU - Alarcón, Graciela S.
AU - Adu, Dwomoa
AU - Avila-Casado, Carmen
AU - Bernatsky, Sasha R.
AU - Bruce, Ian N.
AU - Clarke, Ann E.
AU - Contreras, Gabriel
AU - Fine, Derek M.
AU - Gladman, Dafna D.
AU - Gordon, Caroline
AU - Kalunian, Kenneth C.
AU - Madaio, Michael P.
AU - Rovin, Brad H.
AU - Sanchez-Guerrero, Jorge
AU - Steinsson, Kristjan
AU - Aranow, Cynthia
AU - Balow, James E.
AU - Buyon, Jill P.
AU - Ginzler, Ellen M.
AU - Khamashta, Munther A.
AU - Urowitz, Murray B.
AU - Dooley, Mary Anne
AU - Merrill, Joan T.
AU - Ramsey-Goldman, Rosalind
AU - Font, Josef
AU - Tumlin, James
AU - Stoll, Thomas
AU - Zoma, Asad
PY - 2008/6
Y1 - 2008/6
N2 - Objective. To develop a measure of renal activity in systemic lupus erythematosus and use it to develop a renal response index. Methods. Abstracted data from the medical records of 215 patients with lupus nephritis were sent to 8 nephrologists and 29 rheumatologists for rating. Seven nephrologists and 22 rheumatologists completed the ratings. Each physician rated each patient visit with respect to renal disease activity (none, mild, moderate, or severe). Using the most commonly selected rating for each patient as the gold standard, stepwise regression modeling was performed to identify the variables most related to renal disease activity, and these variables were then used to create an activity score. This activity score could then be applied to 2 consecutive visits to define a renal response index. Results. The renal activity score was computed as follows: proteinuria 0.5-1 gm/day (3 points), proteinuria >1-3 gm/day (5 points), proteinuria >3 gm/day (11 points), urine red blood cell count >10/high-power field (3 points), and urine white blood cell count >10/high-power field (1 point). The chance-adjusted agreement between the renal response index derived from the activity score applied to the paired visits and the plurality physician response rating was 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.59-0.79). Conclusion. Ratings derived from this index for rating of renal response showed reasonable agreement with physician ratings in a pilot study. The index will require further refinement, testing, and validation. A data-driven approach to create renal activity and renal response indices will be useful in both clinical care and research settings.
AB - Objective. To develop a measure of renal activity in systemic lupus erythematosus and use it to develop a renal response index. Methods. Abstracted data from the medical records of 215 patients with lupus nephritis were sent to 8 nephrologists and 29 rheumatologists for rating. Seven nephrologists and 22 rheumatologists completed the ratings. Each physician rated each patient visit with respect to renal disease activity (none, mild, moderate, or severe). Using the most commonly selected rating for each patient as the gold standard, stepwise regression modeling was performed to identify the variables most related to renal disease activity, and these variables were then used to create an activity score. This activity score could then be applied to 2 consecutive visits to define a renal response index. Results. The renal activity score was computed as follows: proteinuria 0.5-1 gm/day (3 points), proteinuria >1-3 gm/day (5 points), proteinuria >3 gm/day (11 points), urine red blood cell count >10/high-power field (3 points), and urine white blood cell count >10/high-power field (1 point). The chance-adjusted agreement between the renal response index derived from the activity score applied to the paired visits and the plurality physician response rating was 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.59-0.79). Conclusion. Ratings derived from this index for rating of renal response showed reasonable agreement with physician ratings in a pilot study. The index will require further refinement, testing, and validation. A data-driven approach to create renal activity and renal response indices will be useful in both clinical care and research settings.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45349102050&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45349102050&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/art.23456
DO - 10.1002/art.23456
M3 - Article
C2 - 18512819
AN - SCOPUS:45349102050
SN - 0004-3591
VL - 58
SP - 1784
EP - 1788
JO - Arthritis and rheumatism
JF - Arthritis and rheumatism
IS - 6
ER -