Systemic Treatment Options for Carcinoid Syndrome

A Systematic Review

Edward M. Wolin*, Al B Benson III

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Background: Carcinoid syndrome symptoms significantly reduce quality of life in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Evidence supporting the use of somatostatin analogues in carcinoid syndrome symptom control dates back 30 years. The introduction of new treatment options for carcinoid syndrome, such as telotristat ethyl in 2017, highlights the need for a review of high-level evidence of new and established systemic treatments. Objective: To examine the efficacy and safety of systemic treatment options for patients with carcinoid syndrome. Method: A systematic review of English language articles was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register using the search terms carcinoid syndrome, clinical trial, clinical study, and prospective study. Additional studies were identified by searching abstracts from oncology or neuroendocrine tumor congresses during the previous year. Prospective, interventional, phase II or III clinical trials or pivotal trials leading to drug approval were included. Studies were required to have >85% of patients with carcinoid syndrome; secondary publications were excluded. Results: The search identified 233 unique records, of which 12 trials met the criteria for inclusion. Interventions assessed in these trials included short-acting and long-acting octreotide, lanreotide prolonged-release and autogel/depot, short-acting and long-acting pasireotide, telotristat ethyl, everolimus, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Somatostatin analogues provided substantial symptom relief for patients with carcinoid syndrome. For refractory symptoms, an increased dose of somatostatin analogue or addition of telotristat ethyl were valuable options. Interventions were generally well tolerated, with few serious treatment-related adverse events. Conclusions: By critically evaluating high-level evidence in a rigorous manner, this review highlights the general lack of consensus regarding what defines symptom control in studies of carcinoid syndrome and the need for standardized treatment guidelines for this disease. More prospective trials of treatments for carcinoid syndrome are warranted to assist oncologists with optimizing treatment selection and sequencing in this patient population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)273-289
Number of pages17
JournalOncology (Switzerland)
Volume96
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

Carcinoid Tumor
Somatostatin
Therapeutics
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Drug Approval
Phase III Clinical Trials
Phase II Clinical Trials
Octreotide
Peptide Receptors
PubMed
Radioisotopes
Publications
Consensus
Language
Quality of Life
Clinical Trials
Prospective Studies
Guidelines
Safety

Keywords

  • Carcinoid
  • Carcinoid syndrome
  • Neuroendocrine tumor
  • Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

@article{4377a0aad7744dc09a0b813def2406a7,
title = "Systemic Treatment Options for Carcinoid Syndrome: A Systematic Review",
abstract = "Background: Carcinoid syndrome symptoms significantly reduce quality of life in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Evidence supporting the use of somatostatin analogues in carcinoid syndrome symptom control dates back 30 years. The introduction of new treatment options for carcinoid syndrome, such as telotristat ethyl in 2017, highlights the need for a review of high-level evidence of new and established systemic treatments. Objective: To examine the efficacy and safety of systemic treatment options for patients with carcinoid syndrome. Method: A systematic review of English language articles was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register using the search terms carcinoid syndrome, clinical trial, clinical study, and prospective study. Additional studies were identified by searching abstracts from oncology or neuroendocrine tumor congresses during the previous year. Prospective, interventional, phase II or III clinical trials or pivotal trials leading to drug approval were included. Studies were required to have >85{\%} of patients with carcinoid syndrome; secondary publications were excluded. Results: The search identified 233 unique records, of which 12 trials met the criteria for inclusion. Interventions assessed in these trials included short-acting and long-acting octreotide, lanreotide prolonged-release and autogel/depot, short-acting and long-acting pasireotide, telotristat ethyl, everolimus, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Somatostatin analogues provided substantial symptom relief for patients with carcinoid syndrome. For refractory symptoms, an increased dose of somatostatin analogue or addition of telotristat ethyl were valuable options. Interventions were generally well tolerated, with few serious treatment-related adverse events. Conclusions: By critically evaluating high-level evidence in a rigorous manner, this review highlights the general lack of consensus regarding what defines symptom control in studies of carcinoid syndrome and the need for standardized treatment guidelines for this disease. More prospective trials of treatments for carcinoid syndrome are warranted to assist oncologists with optimizing treatment selection and sequencing in this patient population.",
keywords = "Carcinoid, Carcinoid syndrome, Neuroendocrine tumor, Therapeutics",
author = "Wolin, {Edward M.} and {Benson III}, {Al B}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1159/000499049",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96",
pages = "273--289",
journal = "Oncology",
issn = "0890-9091",
publisher = "UBM Medica Healthcare Publications",
number = "6",

}

Systemic Treatment Options for Carcinoid Syndrome : A Systematic Review. / Wolin, Edward M.; Benson III, Al B.

In: Oncology (Switzerland), Vol. 96, No. 6, 01.06.2019, p. 273-289.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systemic Treatment Options for Carcinoid Syndrome

T2 - A Systematic Review

AU - Wolin, Edward M.

AU - Benson III, Al B

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Background: Carcinoid syndrome symptoms significantly reduce quality of life in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Evidence supporting the use of somatostatin analogues in carcinoid syndrome symptom control dates back 30 years. The introduction of new treatment options for carcinoid syndrome, such as telotristat ethyl in 2017, highlights the need for a review of high-level evidence of new and established systemic treatments. Objective: To examine the efficacy and safety of systemic treatment options for patients with carcinoid syndrome. Method: A systematic review of English language articles was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register using the search terms carcinoid syndrome, clinical trial, clinical study, and prospective study. Additional studies were identified by searching abstracts from oncology or neuroendocrine tumor congresses during the previous year. Prospective, interventional, phase II or III clinical trials or pivotal trials leading to drug approval were included. Studies were required to have >85% of patients with carcinoid syndrome; secondary publications were excluded. Results: The search identified 233 unique records, of which 12 trials met the criteria for inclusion. Interventions assessed in these trials included short-acting and long-acting octreotide, lanreotide prolonged-release and autogel/depot, short-acting and long-acting pasireotide, telotristat ethyl, everolimus, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Somatostatin analogues provided substantial symptom relief for patients with carcinoid syndrome. For refractory symptoms, an increased dose of somatostatin analogue or addition of telotristat ethyl were valuable options. Interventions were generally well tolerated, with few serious treatment-related adverse events. Conclusions: By critically evaluating high-level evidence in a rigorous manner, this review highlights the general lack of consensus regarding what defines symptom control in studies of carcinoid syndrome and the need for standardized treatment guidelines for this disease. More prospective trials of treatments for carcinoid syndrome are warranted to assist oncologists with optimizing treatment selection and sequencing in this patient population.

AB - Background: Carcinoid syndrome symptoms significantly reduce quality of life in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Evidence supporting the use of somatostatin analogues in carcinoid syndrome symptom control dates back 30 years. The introduction of new treatment options for carcinoid syndrome, such as telotristat ethyl in 2017, highlights the need for a review of high-level evidence of new and established systemic treatments. Objective: To examine the efficacy and safety of systemic treatment options for patients with carcinoid syndrome. Method: A systematic review of English language articles was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register using the search terms carcinoid syndrome, clinical trial, clinical study, and prospective study. Additional studies were identified by searching abstracts from oncology or neuroendocrine tumor congresses during the previous year. Prospective, interventional, phase II or III clinical trials or pivotal trials leading to drug approval were included. Studies were required to have >85% of patients with carcinoid syndrome; secondary publications were excluded. Results: The search identified 233 unique records, of which 12 trials met the criteria for inclusion. Interventions assessed in these trials included short-acting and long-acting octreotide, lanreotide prolonged-release and autogel/depot, short-acting and long-acting pasireotide, telotristat ethyl, everolimus, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Somatostatin analogues provided substantial symptom relief for patients with carcinoid syndrome. For refractory symptoms, an increased dose of somatostatin analogue or addition of telotristat ethyl were valuable options. Interventions were generally well tolerated, with few serious treatment-related adverse events. Conclusions: By critically evaluating high-level evidence in a rigorous manner, this review highlights the general lack of consensus regarding what defines symptom control in studies of carcinoid syndrome and the need for standardized treatment guidelines for this disease. More prospective trials of treatments for carcinoid syndrome are warranted to assist oncologists with optimizing treatment selection and sequencing in this patient population.

KW - Carcinoid

KW - Carcinoid syndrome

KW - Neuroendocrine tumor

KW - Therapeutics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064910476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064910476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000499049

DO - 10.1159/000499049

M3 - Review article

VL - 96

SP - 273

EP - 289

JO - Oncology

JF - Oncology

SN - 0890-9091

IS - 6

ER -