TY - JOUR
T1 - Tacrolimus ointment is more effective than pimecrolimus cream with a similar safety profile in the treatment of atopic dermatitis
T2 - Results from 3 randomized, comparative studies
AU - Paller, Amy S.
AU - Lebwohl, Mark
AU - Fleischer, Alan B.
AU - Antaya, Richard
AU - Langley, Richard G.
AU - Kirsner, Robert S.
AU - Blum, Robin R.
AU - Rico, M. Joyce
AU - Jaracz, Eileen
AU - Crowe, Andrew
AU - Linowski, Gregory J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by Fujisawa Healthcare, Inc.
PY - 2005/5
Y1 - 2005/5
N2 - Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment and pimecrolimus cream in adult and pediatric patients with mild to very severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Methods: One thousand and sixty-five patients were randomized to treatment in 3 multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded, 6-week studies. Results: Based on the Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI), tacrolimus ointment was more effective than pimecrolimus cream at the end of the study in adults (54.1% vs. 34.9%, respectively; P < .0001), in children with moderate/severe disease (67.2% vs. 56.4%, respectively; P =. 04), in the combined analysis (52.8% vs. 39.1%, respectively; P < .0001), and at week 1 in children with mild disease (39.2% vs. 31.2%, respectively; P = .04). Tacrolimus was also more effective than pimecrolimus based on the Investigator Global AD Assessment (IGADA), improvement in percentage of total body surface area affected, and improvement in itch scores (P ≤ .05), with a faster onset of action. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events (AEs), including application site reactions in the 2 studies involving 650 children. Adults treated with tacrolimus experienced a greater number of local application site reactions on day 1; both groups reported a similar incidence of application site reactions thereafter. More pimecrolimus-treated patients than tacrolimus-treated patients withdrew from the studies because of a lack of efficacy (P ≤ .03) or adverse events (P = .002; pediatric mild). Conclusion: Tacrolimus ointment is more effective and has a faster onset of action than pimecrolimus cream in adults and children with AD; their safety profiles are similar.
AB - Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment and pimecrolimus cream in adult and pediatric patients with mild to very severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Methods: One thousand and sixty-five patients were randomized to treatment in 3 multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded, 6-week studies. Results: Based on the Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI), tacrolimus ointment was more effective than pimecrolimus cream at the end of the study in adults (54.1% vs. 34.9%, respectively; P < .0001), in children with moderate/severe disease (67.2% vs. 56.4%, respectively; P =. 04), in the combined analysis (52.8% vs. 39.1%, respectively; P < .0001), and at week 1 in children with mild disease (39.2% vs. 31.2%, respectively; P = .04). Tacrolimus was also more effective than pimecrolimus based on the Investigator Global AD Assessment (IGADA), improvement in percentage of total body surface area affected, and improvement in itch scores (P ≤ .05), with a faster onset of action. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events (AEs), including application site reactions in the 2 studies involving 650 children. Adults treated with tacrolimus experienced a greater number of local application site reactions on day 1; both groups reported a similar incidence of application site reactions thereafter. More pimecrolimus-treated patients than tacrolimus-treated patients withdrew from the studies because of a lack of efficacy (P ≤ .03) or adverse events (P = .002; pediatric mild). Conclusion: Tacrolimus ointment is more effective and has a faster onset of action than pimecrolimus cream in adults and children with AD; their safety profiles are similar.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20944435220&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20944435220&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaad.2004.12.038
DO - 10.1016/j.jaad.2004.12.038
M3 - Article
C2 - 15858471
AN - SCOPUS:20944435220
SN - 0190-9622
VL - 52
SP - 810
EP - 822
JO - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
JF - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
IS - 5
ER -