Taylor v. sturgell, procedural due process, and the day-in-court ideal: Resolving the virtual representation dilemma

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

@article{cde0330d36e74d9cbb86a284796b6dc6,

title = "Taylor v. sturgell, procedural due process, and the day-in-court ideal: Resolving the virtual representation dilemma",

author = "Redish, {Martin H} and Katt, {William J.}",

year = "2009",

month = jul,

day = "1",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "84",

pages = "1877--1918",

journal = "Notre Dame Law Review",

issn = "0745-3515",

publisher = "Notre Dame Law School",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taylor v. sturgell, procedural due process, and the day-in-court ideal

T2 - Resolving the virtual representation dilemma

AU - Redish, Martin H

AU - Katt, William J.

PY - 2009/7/1

Y1 - 2009/7/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349970560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349970560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:70349970560

SN - 0745-3515

VL - 84

SP - 1877

EP - 1918

JO - Notre Dame Law Review

JF - Notre Dame Law Review

IS - 5

ER -