Technical and immunologic progress in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

Dixon B. Kaufman*, Joseph R Leventhal, Lorenzo Gallon, Michele A. Parker, Michael D. Elliott, Mihai Gheorghiade, Alan J. Koffron, Jonathan Paul Fryer, Michael Messod Abecassis, Frank P. Stuart

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations


Background. During the past few years the use of new immunosuppressants and refinements in surgical technique of simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation have resulted in markedly improved outcomes. This is a retrospective study of 208 SPK transplants performed at Northwestern University, demonstrating the advances made at a single center that are reflective of the field at large. Methods. An 8.5-year time span was split into 4 distinct eras marking sequential changes in immunosuppression and surgical technique that ensued. SPK transplant outcomes of patient and graft survival and rejection rates were compared. Also examined were end points related to the changing risk profile of the recipients, as well as quality of allograft function and rates of rehospitalizations. Results. Recipients receiving tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression had patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates significantly higher than those of earlier cohorts. The elimination of corticosteroids did not reduce survival rates or increase rejection risk. The use of pancreatic exocrine enteric drainage technique over bladder drainage reduced rehospitalizations. Conclusions. Advances in immunosuppression management combined with technical refinements have made SPK transplantation a safer and more effective treatment option for the diabetic, uremic patient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)545-554
Number of pages10
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 1 2002

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery


Dive into the research topics of 'Technical and immunologic progress in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this