Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma

Gary Hudes*, Michael Carducci, Piotr Tomczak, Janice Dutcher, Robert Figlin, Anil Kapoor, Elzbieta Staroslawska, Jeffrey Sosman, David McDermott, István Bodrogi, Zoran Kovacevic, Vladimir Lesovoy, Ingo G H Schmidt-Wolf, Olga Barbarash, Erhan Gokmen, Timothy O'Toole, Stephanie Lustgarten, Laurence Moore, Robert J. Motzer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3390 Scopus citations


BACKGROUND: Interferon alfa is widely used for metastatic renal-cell carcinoma but has limited efficacy and tolerability. Temsirolimus, a specific inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin kinase, may benefit patients with this disease. METHODS: In this multicenter, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 626 patients with previously untreated, poor-prognosis metastatic renal-cell carcinoma to receive 25 mg of intravenous temsirolimus weekly, 3 million U of interferon alfa (with an increase to 18 million U) subcutaneously three times weekly, or combination therapy with 15 mg of temsirolimus weekly plus 6 million U of interferon alfa three times weekly. The primary end point was overall survival in comparisons of the temsirolimus group and the combination-therapy group with the interferon group. RESULTS: Patients who received temsirolimus alone had longer overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.92; P = 0.008) and progression-free survival (P<0.001) than did patients who received interferon alone. Overall survival in the combination-therapy group did not differ significantly from that in the interferon group (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.20; P = 0.70). Median overall survival times in the interferon group, the temsirolimus group, and the combination-therapy group were 7.3, 10.9, and 8.4 months, respectively. Rash, peripheral edema, hyperglycemia, and hyperlipidemia were more common in the temsirolimus group, whereas asthenia was more common in the interferon group. There were fewer patients with serious adverse events in the temsirolimus group than in the interferon group (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with interferon alfa, temsirolimus improved overall survival among patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma and a poor prognosis. The addition of temsirolimus to interferon did not improve survival.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2271-2281
Number of pages11
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Issue number22
StatePublished - May 31 2007

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this