Test accommodations for individuals with neurological conditions completing the nih toolbox-cognition battery: An evaluation of frequency and appropriateness

Susan Magasi*, Mark Harniss, David S. Tulsky, Matthew L. Cohen, Robert K. Heaton, Allen W. Heinemann

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: First, to evaluate the frequency with which individuals with neurological conditions require test administration accommodations for the NIH Toolbox-Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB). Second, to evaluate the appropriateness of accommodations provided by administrators, including adherence to NIHTB-CB Reasonable Accommodations Guidelines. Method: Adults with traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, or stroke (n = 604) completed the NIHTB-CB and other assessments as part of a multisite study. We provide a descriptive, secondary analysis of test administrator notes to determine use and appropriateness of accommodations. Results: Of the 604 participants, 450 (75%) completed the NIHTB-CB using standard administration procedures, but 137 (22.6%) encountered accessibility challenges that required accommodations. Participants with motor function impairments were most likely to receive at least 1 of 3 kinds of accommodations: (a) use of nonstandard methods of entering responses using standard input devices, (b) use of alternate input devices, or (c) help from the test administrator to enter a response. Fatigue and/or impulsivity led to nonstandard administration by 48 (7.9%) individuals. Post hoc audit of test administrator notes revealed that despite careful instructions and supervision, 49 (56.3%) of the accommodated administrations breached standardization and scores could not be interpreted using test norms. Conclusion: Although the NIHTB-CB was developed for individuals without neurological impairment, most individuals with neurological conditions completed the standardized administration without accommodations. When accommodations were needed, administrators did not adhere to the official Reasonable Accommodations Guidelines in more than half of the cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)455-463
Number of pages9
JournalRehabilitation Psychology
Volume62
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2017

Keywords

  • Brain injuries
  • Neuropsychological tests cognition
  • Spinal cord injuries
  • Stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Test accommodations for individuals with neurological conditions completing the nih toolbox-cognition battery: An evaluation of frequency and appropriateness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this