The association between surgeon subspecialty training and postoperative outcomes following surgery for pelvic organ prolapse

Keyphrases

• Adjusted Odds Ratio 20%
• American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) 20%
• American Society of Anesthesiology 20%
• Apical Suspension 20%
• Body Mass Index 20%
• Code Case 20%
• Cohort Analysis 20%
• Concurrent Surgery 20%
• Confidence Interval 20%
• Current Procedural Terminology Codes 20%
• Descriptive Statistics 20%
• Genitourinary Complications 20%
• Growing Patients 20%
• Hysterectomy 20%
• Logistic Regression Model 20%
• Multivariable Logistic Regression 40%
• Obliterative Procedure 20%
• Obstetrician-gynecologists 100%
• Pairwise Analysis 20%
• Patient Care 20%
• Patient Needs 20%
• Pelvic Organ Prolapse 100%
• Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery 20%
• Perioperative Complication Rate 20%
• Postoperative Complications 80%
• Postoperative Outcomes 100%
• Potential Confounders 20%
• Practice Patterns 20%
• Prolapse Surgery 80%
• Readmission 20%
• Readmission Rates 20%
• Reconstructive Surgery 20%
• Reoperation 20%
• Reoperation Rate 20%
• Retrospective Analysis 20%
• Sling 20%
• Specialist Training 100%
• Surgeon Experience 40%
• Surgeons 100%
• Surgeons Practice 20%
• Surgical Case 20%
• Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse 20%
• Training Background 20%
• Training Outcomes 100%
• Urogynecologists 100%

Medicine and Dentistry

• Anesthesiology 16%
• Body Mass Index 16%
• Current Procedural Terminology 16%
• Hysterectomy 16%
• Logistic Regression Analysis 33%
• Odds Ratio 16%
• Patient Care 16%
• Pelvic Organ Prolapse 100%
• Postoperative Complication 83%
• Prolapse 50%
• Quality Improvement 16%
• Reconstructive Surgery 16%
• Reoperation 33%
• Surgeon 100%