TY - JOUR
T1 - The association of stillbirth with placental abnormalities in growth-restricted and normally grown fetuses
AU - Freedman, Alexa A.
AU - Silver, Robert M.
AU - Gibbins, Karen J.
AU - Hogue, Carol J.
AU - Goldenberg, Robert L.
AU - Dudley, Donald J.
AU - Pinar, Halit
AU - Drews-Botsch, Carolyn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2019/7
Y1 - 2019/7
N2 - Background: Stillbirth, defined as foetal death ≥20 weeks’ gestation, is associated with poor foetal growth and is often attributed to placental abnormalities, which are also associated with poor foetal growth. Evaluating inter-relationships between placental abnormalities, poor foetal growth, and stillbirth may improve our understanding of the underlying mechanisms for some causes of stillbirth. Objective: Our primary objective was to determine whether poor foetal growth, operationalised as small for gestational age (SGA), mediates the relationship between placental abnormalities and stillbirth. Methods: We used data from the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network study, a population-based case-control study conducted from 2006-2008. Our analysis included 266 stillbirths and 1135 livebirths. We evaluated associations of stillbirth with five types of placental characteristics (developmental disorders, maternal and foetal inflammatory responses, and maternal and foetal circulatory disorders) and examined mediation of these relationships by SGA. We also assessed exposure-mediator interaction. Models were adjusted for maternal age, race/ethnicity, education, body mass index, parity, and smoking status. Results: All five placental abnormalities were more prevalent in cases than controls. After adjustment for potential confounders, maternal inflammatory response (odds ratio [OR] 2.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.77, 3.75), maternal circulatory disorders OR 4.14, 95% CI 2.93, 5.84, and foetal circulatory disorders OR 4.58, 95% CI 3.11, 6.74 were strongly associated with stillbirth, and the relationships did not appear to be mediated by SGA status. Associations for developmental disorders and foetal inflammatory response diverged for SGA and non-SGA births, and strong associations were only observed when SGA was not present. Conclusions: Foetal growth did not mediate the relationships between placental abnormalities and stillbirth. The relationships of stillbirth with maternal and foetal circulatory disorders and maternal inflammatory response appear to be independent of poor foetal growth, while developmental disorders and foetal inflammatory response likely interact with foetal growth to affect stillbirth risk.
AB - Background: Stillbirth, defined as foetal death ≥20 weeks’ gestation, is associated with poor foetal growth and is often attributed to placental abnormalities, which are also associated with poor foetal growth. Evaluating inter-relationships between placental abnormalities, poor foetal growth, and stillbirth may improve our understanding of the underlying mechanisms for some causes of stillbirth. Objective: Our primary objective was to determine whether poor foetal growth, operationalised as small for gestational age (SGA), mediates the relationship between placental abnormalities and stillbirth. Methods: We used data from the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network study, a population-based case-control study conducted from 2006-2008. Our analysis included 266 stillbirths and 1135 livebirths. We evaluated associations of stillbirth with five types of placental characteristics (developmental disorders, maternal and foetal inflammatory responses, and maternal and foetal circulatory disorders) and examined mediation of these relationships by SGA. We also assessed exposure-mediator interaction. Models were adjusted for maternal age, race/ethnicity, education, body mass index, parity, and smoking status. Results: All five placental abnormalities were more prevalent in cases than controls. After adjustment for potential confounders, maternal inflammatory response (odds ratio [OR] 2.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.77, 3.75), maternal circulatory disorders OR 4.14, 95% CI 2.93, 5.84, and foetal circulatory disorders OR 4.58, 95% CI 3.11, 6.74 were strongly associated with stillbirth, and the relationships did not appear to be mediated by SGA status. Associations for developmental disorders and foetal inflammatory response diverged for SGA and non-SGA births, and strong associations were only observed when SGA was not present. Conclusions: Foetal growth did not mediate the relationships between placental abnormalities and stillbirth. The relationships of stillbirth with maternal and foetal circulatory disorders and maternal inflammatory response appear to be independent of poor foetal growth, while developmental disorders and foetal inflammatory response likely interact with foetal growth to affect stillbirth risk.
KW - foetal growth retardation
KW - infant
KW - placenta
KW - small for gestational age
KW - stillbirth
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068714737&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068714737&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ppe.12563
DO - 10.1111/ppe.12563
M3 - Article
C2 - 31347723
AN - SCOPUS:85068714737
SN - 0269-5022
VL - 33
SP - 274
EP - 383
JO - Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
JF - Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
IS - 4
ER -