Abstract
Background: Pediatric asthma hospitalizations peak in early autumn. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of montelukast therapy in reducing the asthma burden in children when initiated prophylactically on school return. Methods: This was a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of children with asthma aged 6 to 14 years. No minimum asthma symptoms were required, and patients could continue inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use. Montelukast, 5 mg, chewable tablet (n = 580) or matching placebo (n = 582) was taken the night before the first day of school and nightly thereafter for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the percentage of days with worsening asthma, defined by one of the following: (1) increased β-agonist use, (2) increased daytime symptoms, (3) awake "all night," (4) oral corticosteroid rescue or increased ICS use for worsening asthma, or (5) unanticipated health care utilization. Results: The reduction in the percentage of days with worsening asthma with montelukast use versus placebo use was not significant (24.3% vs 27.2%, P = .07). Prespecified subgroup analyses demonstrated nonsignificant trends favoring montelukast therapy in boys and older children but no effect by baseline ICS use or history of cold symptoms. Post hoc analysis showed a nonsignificant trend favoring montelukast therapy in reducing worsening asthma days for children commencing school after August 15 compared with earlier commencement. Conclusions: Montelukast use was not significantly more effective than was placebo use in reducing the percentage of days with worsening asthma when initiated at the start of the school year. The effect of montelukast treatment on the fall peak in asthma burden may depend on sex, age, and the date of school return.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 174-181 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology |
Volume | 105 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 2010 |
Funding
Funding Sources: This study was supported by Merck & Co Inc. Disclosures: Dr Weiss served as a consultant on the scientific advisory committee for this study. Dr Gern was on the scientific advisory committee for this study, receives grant support for clinical research from Merck and AstraZeneca , receives speaking fees from Merck, and is on an advisory panel at GlaxoSmithKline. Mr Johnston was on the scientific advisory committee for this study and has received research funding and honoraria from Merck Frosst Canada , AstraZeneca PLC , and GlaxoSmithKline Canada . Dr Sears was on the scientific advisory committee for this study; has received research funding from AstraZeneca and Merck Frosst Canada and consultation fees and honoraria from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Frosst Canada, and Nycomed; and holds a chair in respiratory epidemiology jointly endowed by AstraZeneca and McMaster University. Dr Jones was on the scientific advisory committee for this study and has done consulting and advisory work for Merck and Genentech. Drs Gia, Smugar, Edelman, and Grant and Ms Watkins are employees of Merck & Co Inc and may own stock or have stock options in the company.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Immunology and Allergy
- Immunology