The Benefit of More Bad Choices in Observational Learning

Pawan Poojary, Randall Berry

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

It is common in online markets for agents to learn from others' actions. Such observational learning can lead to herding or information cascades in which agents eventually "follow the crowd". Models for such cascades have been well studied for Bayes-rational agents faced with deciding between two possible actions-one "good"action and one "bad"action. In this paper, we consider the case when these agents instead have more than two actions, where again only one of these is good. We show that sequential observational learning in such settings has substantially different properties compared to the binary action case and further show than increasing the number of "bad"choices from 1 to 2, can improve the agents' learning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication2024 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, ISIT 2024 - Proceedings
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages3302-3307
Number of pages6
ISBN (Electronic)9798350382846
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024
Event2024 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, ISIT 2024 - Athens, Greece
Duration: Jul 7 2024Jul 12 2024

Publication series

NameIEEE International Symposium on Information Theory - Proceedings
ISSN (Print)2157-8095

Conference

Conference2024 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, ISIT 2024
Country/TerritoryGreece
CityAthens
Period7/7/247/12/24

Funding

This work was supported in part by the NSF under grants CNS-1908807, ECCS-2030251 and ECCS-2216970.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Theoretical Computer Science
  • Information Systems
  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Applied Mathematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Benefit of More Bad Choices in Observational Learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this