Abstract
Practitioners have long criticized risk-factor disclosures in the 10-K as generic and boilerplate. In response, regulators emphasize the importance of being specific. By using a computing algorithm, this paper establishes a new measure (Specificity) to quantify the level of specificity of firms’ qualitative risk-factor disclosures. We first examine determinants of variations in Specificity, and document that firms with high proprietary costs provide less specific risk-factor disclosures. More importantly, we find that, controlling for numerous determinants, the market reaction to the 10-K filing is positively and significantly associated with Specificity. In addition, our results suggest that analysts are better able to assess fundamental risk when firms’ risk-factor disclosures are more specific. Together, these findings suggest that more specific risk-factor disclosures benefit users of financial statements.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1005-1045 |
Number of pages | 41 |
Journal | Review of Accounting Studies |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 1 2016 |
Keywords
- Analyst risk assessments
- Market reactions
- Risk-factor disclosure
- Scenario analysis
- Specificity
- Trading volume
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Accounting
- General Business, Management and Accounting