TY - JOUR
T1 - The Boston Marathon Bombings mass casualty incident
T2 - One emergency department's information systems challenges and opportunities
AU - Landman, Adam
AU - Teich, Jonathan M.
AU - Pruitt, Peter
AU - Moore, Samantha E.
AU - Theriault, Jennifer
AU - Dorisca, Elizabeth
AU - Harris, Sheila
AU - Crim, Heidi
AU - Lurie, Nicole
AU - Goralnick, Eric
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 American College of Emergency Physicians.
PY - 2015/7/1
Y1 - 2015/7/1
N2 - Emergency department (ED) information systems are designed to support efficient and safe emergency care. These same systems often play a critical role in disasters to facilitate real-time situation awareness, information management, and communication. In this article, we describe one ED's experiences with ED information systems during the April 2013 Boston Marathon bombings. During postevent debriefings, staff shared that our ED information systems and workflow did not optimally support this incident; we found challenges with our unidentified patient naming convention, real-time situational awareness of patient location, and documentation of assessments, orders, and procedures. As a result, before our next mass gathering event, we changed our unidentified patient naming convention to more clearly distinguish multiple, simultaneous, unidentified patients. We also made changes to the disaster registration workflow and enhanced roles and responsibilities for updating electronic systems. Health systems should conduct disaster drills using their ED information systems to identify inefficiencies before an actual incident. ED information systems may require enhancements to better support disasters. Newer technologies, such as radiofrequency identification, could further improve disaster information management and communication but require careful evaluation and implementation into daily ED workflow.
AB - Emergency department (ED) information systems are designed to support efficient and safe emergency care. These same systems often play a critical role in disasters to facilitate real-time situation awareness, information management, and communication. In this article, we describe one ED's experiences with ED information systems during the April 2013 Boston Marathon bombings. During postevent debriefings, staff shared that our ED information systems and workflow did not optimally support this incident; we found challenges with our unidentified patient naming convention, real-time situational awareness of patient location, and documentation of assessments, orders, and procedures. As a result, before our next mass gathering event, we changed our unidentified patient naming convention to more clearly distinguish multiple, simultaneous, unidentified patients. We also made changes to the disaster registration workflow and enhanced roles and responsibilities for updating electronic systems. Health systems should conduct disaster drills using their ED information systems to identify inefficiencies before an actual incident. ED information systems may require enhancements to better support disasters. Newer technologies, such as radiofrequency identification, could further improve disaster information management and communication but require careful evaluation and implementation into daily ED workflow.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931561947&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84931561947&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.06.009
DO - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.06.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 24997562
AN - SCOPUS:84931561947
SN - 0196-0644
VL - 66
SP - 51
EP - 59
JO - Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians
JF - Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians
IS - 1
ER -